Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Buddyzbuddy

(1,889 posts)

7. So does this mean the next Democratic President

Reply to bigtree (Original post)

Thu Sep 25, 2025, 12:17 AM

Sep 25

could remove a Supreme Court Justice by any means necessary without facing consequences because he/she has immunity and there would be no way to enforce a reversal decided by the courts?
Rhetorical question?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge declares Trump may have broken the law, but she has no authority to stop him, even from breaking it again [View all] bigtree Sep 24 OP

SCOTUS offers no support to the lower courts newdeal2 Sep 24 #1

not clear how the judge can summarily say the plaintiffs cannot show irreparable harm. unblock Sep 24 #2

Because they can't show that he can't fire them FBaggins Sep 25 #5

She will probably reinstate them if they win the lawsuit. But she doesnt see grounds to do so immediately. Right? SSJVegeta Sep 24 #3

I don't think so FBaggins Sep 24 #4

Wut Constitution? Kid Berwyn Sep 25 #6

So does this mean the next Democratic President Buddyzbuddy Sep 25 #7