Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thesquanderer

(12,685 posts)
7. I actually don't think this is such a big deal...
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:19 AM
Jul 2

...because it's relatively minor compared to the bigger problem we already have. It's like being concerned about the draft from an open window when half the house has already fallen down.

from the article:

Under current law, amended over the years by the Supreme Court and Congress, parties can make unlimited independent expenditures in support of a candidate but cannot exceed limits on coordinated spending


This is about permitting that coordination. The total available to spend would not be changed. Only the ability for them to coordinate with the actual campaign in terms of how and where they spend. Sure, it's bad, but considering the bigger issue of all the money going into parties and pacs in the first place, I suspect the inability to (officially ) coordinate their activities with the campaigns isn't so much of an impediment to begin with, and that the real-world impact would not be so great. In a sense, to a great extent, that ship has already sailed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court takes up ma...»Reply #7