Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FakeNoose

(39,688 posts)
17. Sam Altman should probably re-think that
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 01:44 PM
Wednesday

There are some jobs that will never be taken over by robots (AI) because it won't be cost effective. For example, fast food workers can rest easy because it's cheaper to pay humans minimum wages that to purchase robots to replace them. Also there are hazardous jobs that will continue being done by humans, such as plumbing, electrical, many outdoor jobs, as well as some law-enforcement and fire-fighting jobs but eventually those will be taken over by robots after the easier jobs have all been automated.

The trade-off will continue to be whether the owners decide to invest in more robots, or is it easier and cheaper to use humans for some jobs? The cost of robots will come down eventually, as more automated manufacturing makes it cheaper to build and program the robots. When robots build the robots, humans will still be the programmers and the quality-control testers, at least for a time.

I have a feeling that Sam Altman will be long dead, as we all will be, when the human race finally reaches that point.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great for big business, not so great for working people. groundloop Wednesday #1
The intent is to replace all the workers. Sam Altman of OpenAI said over a year ago that the goal highplainsdem Wednesday #3
Sam Altman should probably re-think that FakeNoose Wednesday #17
So that's 22 million people times $65,000 each bucolic_frolic Wednesday #2
Predicting the future is tough Progressive dog Wednesday #4
Ai can create data way faster than humans FredGarvin Wednesday #5
AI does not create data Progressive dog Wednesday #7
I use it quite a bit at the moment Blackjackdavey Wednesday #16
Nailed it. gypsy11 Wednesday #23
It is very useful for assisting in writing computer code, but that is all I use it for. ToxMarz Wednesday #21
The Soylent Green Corporation will be taking applicants. CentralMass Wednesday #6
The ship should be here any day to carry us away. Haggard Celine Wednesday #8
Destination the Thanatorium. CentralMass Wednesday #13
It won't need insurance or Social Security, Bayard Wednesday #9
Yes it can. OnlinePoker Wednesday #22
They look awfully s-l-o-w... Bayard Wednesday #25
Slow now, but that's what AI is working to fix. OnlinePoker Wednesday #27
In 1950s, we were all going to be obliterated by nukes, then computers wrere going to take our jobs, then internet, etc. Silent Type Wednesday #10
Greed will win out. CentralMass Wednesday #14
The corporate stooges in power don't even want to let us have our OWN money that was socked away over the course of... LudwigPastorius Wednesday #19
Corporate stooges will be worthless without 300+ million buying their products. But hey, no need to ruin a good a Silent Type Wednesday #20
more likely a "thinning of the herd". ret5hd Wednesday #26
You must have more babies so we can deny them jobs!! chowder66 Wednesday #11
I smell click bait. BootinUp Wednesday #12
Yup....and then a CME hits the earth purr-rat beauty Wednesday #15
No worries! LudwigPastorius Wednesday #18
It's either a bubble and screws the economy or its successful and it destroys the economy SamuelTheThird Wednesday #24
Good Ole Boys OC375 Wednesday #28
Does the Iceberg Index use some sort of AI? flvegan Wednesday #29
Gee, What Could Go Wrong Economically.... ProfessorGAC Wednesday #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»MIT study finds AI can al...»Reply #17