Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BootinUp

(49,020 posts)
Mon Nov 18, 2024, 09:00 AM 19 hrs ago

Maybe Bluesky has "won" (Technical blog post on Bluesky vs others)


November 15, 2024

November has sucked so far. One upside of the terrible nonsense is that more people are fleeing X. Many are choosing Bluesky. I’ve seen a bunch of takes about this recently, but I keep seeing things I disagree with. I figure that’s a good enough excuse to write more about this weird-assed social network.

Decentralized? Federated? Neither.
When writing about Bluesky, I’ve seen folks mention that it’s either federated or decentralized. I’m here to tell you that it’s currently neither. This one really irks me because the service is getting the credit for work it hasn’t done.

One problem here is that the whole “decentralized” thing is complicated. I believe the Bluesky team is putting in a lot of good-faith effort to becoming a decentralized platform. But, this work is tricky because their architectural choices are quite novel.

As I’ve written previosuly, the AT Protocol (atproto) that powers Bluesky is really complex. It’s made up of three main parts: Personal Data Servers (PDSs), Relays, and App Views.

SNIP

Maybe Bluesky has “won”
I don’t know what the social media landscape will look like in 6 months, but I’d bet things will change. If Bluesky comes out as a “winner” and more posting happens there, I think I’m generally fine with that. At least for now.

The whole Twitter mess has taught me not to attach myself too closely with these things anymore. I hung on far too long to Twitter while it made me feel terrible. My goal going forward is to post more to my own site and aggregate to any social channel I currently care about. I’m happy to interact on any that I’m a part of, but I’m also going to be much quicker to pull the ripcord if things start going down hill.

Full blog post
https://anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/maybe-bluesky-has-won
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maybe Bluesky has "won" (Technical blog post on Bluesky vs others) (Original Post) BootinUp 19 hrs ago OP
I recommend this with the caveat that I still don't understand social media. hunter 18 hrs ago #1

hunter

(38,910 posts)
1. I recommend this with the caveat that I still don't understand social media.
Mon Nov 18, 2024, 10:00 AM
18 hrs ago

The technical side is interesting to me. Otherwise DU is my only social media. I find that by itself nearly overwhelming.

I had twitter blocked before Elon Musk bought it as it seemed to me a firehouse of unactionable bullshit. There simply wan't enough signal in all the noise. Television news and opinion strikes me the same way.

It seems I should learn what social media is about, since it apparently played a big part in this election. That doesn't mean I'll be signing onto Bluesky or any other social media to investigate.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe Bluesky has "won" (...