Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Courts keep ruling... thank you Senator Shcumer for preventing the government shutdown (Original Post) question everything Monday OP
Meh, the performative anger at Schumer seems to be mostly done, he's back to doing actual work. tritsofme Monday #1
All of those cases would almost certainly still have been issued. Ms. Toad Monday #2
And after the "2-3 weeks?" They were going to keep the government shutdown for as long as they wanted question everything Monday #3
Umm Hmm. Ms. Toad Monday #9
Post removed Post removed Monday #19
I believe the anti deficiency act would have allowed the courts to continue to operate after the 2-3 week period. Scrivener7 Monday #4
Doesn't the Antideficiency Act exist to prohibit the spending of funds outside of what was appropriated by Congress? tritsofme Monday #5
It provides for the continuation of the court's essential work related to the safety of Scrivener7 Monday #6
That doesn't necessarily mean the courts would have been able to hear challenges to Trump's actions tritsofme Monday #8
If the government is shut down, what makes you think... yowzayowzayowza Monday #12
I'm not sure how that makes sense in this context. tritsofme Monday #15
Dismantle the courts too based on whatever... yowzayowzayowza Monday #17
You are probably correct - Ms. Toad Monday #11
Yes. Though I'm thinking it's not worth the effort to try to convince some here of that. Scrivener7 Monday #13
Yup. Ms. Toad Monday #14
Post removed Post removed Monday #7
Indeed. Histrionics is not an effective governing philosophy. n/t yowzayowzayowza Monday #10
That's the way I see it, too... Mahalo! Cha Monday #16
It was a lose/lose scenario for the Dems drmeow Monday #18
If the Federal Government was shutdown, musk/trump would have been free to shut down everything LetMyPeopleVote Monday #20

Ms. Toad

(36,464 posts)
2. All of those cases would almost certainly still have been issued.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 05:51 PM
Monday

Federal courts have an operating reserve, so they can continue to operate for 2-3 weeks after a government shut-down. In other words, even if the government had shut down on the 14th, the courts would just now be nearing the point at which they had to shut down.

So no thanks to Schumer for giving in without a responsible deal in exchange - especially for failing to get the provisions removed which forfeited legislative power to the executive branch.

question everything

(49,940 posts)
3. And after the "2-3 weeks?" They were going to keep the government shutdown for as long as they wanted
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 05:54 PM
Monday

Ms. Toad

(36,464 posts)
9. Umm Hmm.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:14 PM
Monday

A shut down would impact Red areas just as much as blue areas. It would not have lasted much longer than that.

And my point is that you are thanking Schumer for something that would have happened even if the government shut down. It is factually incorrect that the decisions would not have issued had the government shut down.

Schumer should not have agreed to the continuing resolution without getting something return.

Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #9)

Scrivener7

(54,997 posts)
4. I believe the anti deficiency act would have allowed the courts to continue to operate after the 2-3 week period.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 05:57 PM
Monday

tritsofme

(19,036 posts)
5. Doesn't the Antideficiency Act exist to prohibit the spending of funds outside of what was appropriated by Congress?
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:02 PM
Monday

Scrivener7

(54,997 posts)
6. It provides for the continuation of the court's essential work related to the safety of
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:06 PM
Monday

human life and protection of property.

tritsofme

(19,036 posts)
8. That doesn't necessarily mean the courts would have been able to hear challenges to Trump's actions
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:14 PM
Monday

And still, no one would be paid.

The functioning of the courts would become severely impaired during a long term government shutdown, which is what we would have been facing down.

yowzayowzayowza

(7,056 posts)
12. If the government is shut down, what makes you think...
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:17 PM
Monday

Comrade Bonespurs is going to respect the Antideficiency Act?

tritsofme

(19,036 posts)
15. I'm not sure how that makes sense in this context.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:23 PM
Monday

It is the Antideficiency Act that causes the government to shutdown when funding lapses.

Trump/Musk would have loved to have the government shutdown so they could further dismantle it.

Ms. Toad

(36,464 posts)
11. You are probably correct -
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:16 PM
Monday

that after the reserve runs out, Article III courts would continue to operate as mission critical.

Ms. Toad

(36,464 posts)
14. Yup.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:23 PM
Monday

Not to mention that shutdowns don't typically last for longer than the operating reserve federal courts have. One under Clinton was 21 days, and the last one under Trump was 35 days. People are already angry enough (including Republican congress critters - a few of whom are waking up) that I don't think this one would have lasted very long.

Response to question everything (Original post)

drmeow

(5,511 posts)
18. It was a lose/lose scenario for the Dems
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 07:06 PM
Monday

Keep the government open and make Trump happy/Shut down the government and make Musk happy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Courts keep rulin...