Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BOSSHOG

(41,804 posts) Tue Apr 1, 2025, 10:52 AM Tuesday

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO NAVY CHIEF PETTY OFFICERS

132 Years Young. Came to being 01 April 1893.
Honor, Courage, Commitment.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO NAVY CHIEF PETTY OFFICERS (Original Post) BOSSHOG Tuesday OP

Salute - with appreciation! BoRaGard Tuesday #1

Hail to the Chiefs Submariner Tuesday #2

Hear, Hear Shipmate BOSSHOG Tuesday #4

Although Senior and Master Chiefs BOSSHOG Tuesday #6

I respected the Chief more than officers. Emile Tuesday #3

Navy chiefs have treasure chests full of "know how". oasis Tuesday #5

BoRaGard

(4,721 posts)

1. Salute - with appreciation!

Reply to BOSSHOG (Original post)

Tue Apr 1, 2025, 10:56 AM

Tuesday

Submariner

(12,949 posts)

2. Hail to the Chiefs

Reply to BOSSHOG (Original post)

Tue Apr 1, 2025, 11:06 AM

Tuesday

BOSSHOG

(41,804 posts)

4. Hear, Hear Shipmate

Reply to Submariner (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 1, 2025, 11:10 AM

Tuesday

BOSSHOG

(41,804 posts)

6. Although Senior and Master Chiefs

Reply to Submariner (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 1, 2025, 11:15 AM

Tuesday

Didn’t come to be until 1 June 1958. One Bad Ass Motherfucker could say Chiefs are the fathers and mothers of the stars of the show. Let’s kick it around in the goat locker.

Emile

(33,758 posts)

3. I respected the Chief more than officers.

Reply to BOSSHOG (Original post)

Tue Apr 1, 2025, 11:09 AM

Tuesday

oasis

(52,144 posts)

5. Navy chiefs have treasure chests full of "know how".

Reply to BOSSHOG (Original post)

Tue Apr 1, 2025, 11:15 AM

Tuesday

Reply to this discussion