Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe conservative think tank AEI says the tariff formula makes no sense -- AND a math error made the numbers even worse.
The formula for the tariffs, originally credited to the Council of Economic Advisers and published by the Office of the United States Trade Representative, does not make economic sense. The trade deficit with a given country is not determined only by tariffs and non-tariff trade barriers, but also by international capital flows, supply chains, comparative advantage, geography, etc.
But even if one were to take the Trump Administrations tariff formula seriously, it makes an error that inflates the tariffs assumed to be levied by foreign countries four-fold. As a result, the reciprocal tariffs imposed by President Trump are highly inflated as well.
. . . . Correcting the Trump Administrations error would reduce the tariffs assumed to be applied by each country to the United States to about a fourth of their stated level, and as a result, cut the tariffs announced by President Trump on Wednesday by the same fraction, subject to the 10 percent tariff floor. As shown in Table 1, the tariff rate would not exceed 14 percent for any country. For all but a few countries, the tariff would be exactly 10 percent, the floor imposed by the Trump Administration.
Now, our view is that the formula the administration relied on has no foundation in either economic theory or trade law. But if we are going to pretend that it is a sound basis for US trade policy, we should at least be allowed to expect that the relevant White House officials do their calculations carefully. Hopefully they will correct their mistake soon: the resulting trade liberalization would provide a much-needed boost to the economy and may yet help us stave off a recession
. https://www.aei.org/economics/president-trumps-tariff-formula-makes-no-economic-sense-its-also-based-on-an-error/
But even if one were to take the Trump Administrations tariff formula seriously, it makes an error that inflates the tariffs assumed to be levied by foreign countries four-fold. As a result, the reciprocal tariffs imposed by President Trump are highly inflated as well.
. . . . Correcting the Trump Administrations error would reduce the tariffs assumed to be applied by each country to the United States to about a fourth of their stated level, and as a result, cut the tariffs announced by President Trump on Wednesday by the same fraction, subject to the 10 percent tariff floor. As shown in Table 1, the tariff rate would not exceed 14 percent for any country. For all but a few countries, the tariff would be exactly 10 percent, the floor imposed by the Trump Administration.
Now, our view is that the formula the administration relied on has no foundation in either economic theory or trade law. But if we are going to pretend that it is a sound basis for US trade policy, we should at least be allowed to expect that the relevant White House officials do their calculations carefully. Hopefully they will correct their mistake soon: the resulting trade liberalization would provide a much-needed boost to the economy and may yet help us stave off a recession
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The conservative think tank AEI says the tariff formula makes no sense -- AND a math error made the numbers even worse. (Original Post)
pnwmom
Apr 6
OP
J_William_Ryan
(2,653 posts)1. A failed Trump 'administration' of incompetence and blind stupidity.
Further proof Trump is unfit to be president.
Bayard
(24,756 posts)2. trump probably did the math himself
sop
(13,761 posts)3. Trump on his social media platform: "MY POLICIES WILL NEVER CHANGE."
,
central scrutinizer
(12,557 posts)4. The "formula" looks mathematical
An example of what we called in graduate school - proof by cumbersome notation. Introduce a bunch of poorly defined parameters and operations, sprinkle in a bunch of foreign symbols and voila!
yellow dahlia
(2,262 posts)5. Thank you for sharing. Important information and assessment. n/t
newdeal2
(2,316 posts)6. It's called a goal seek
Trump wanted bigly numbers to put on his posters. His aides put together this nonsense to satisfy him.
Abolishinist
(2,422 posts)7. Oh please! What's a small math error among friends.
Not only that, but these computations (as far as I know) only include goods. A full 75% of our global trade is in services, technology, movies, programming, banking, etc., which we own.
Initech
(104,520 posts)8. Why don't we ask the creepy son in law? He's the one feeding Trump this garbage.

Meowmee
(8,626 posts)9. My brother figured out how he calculated it and he said it is not AI
I have forgotten what he said, but I will post back later about it.
LilyBelle
(34 posts)10. Such rank incompetence, as usual
Pathetic.
LetMyPeopleVote
(161,739 posts)11. John Oliver explains trump's tariff formula
Link to tweet
John Oliver: "[Trump's chart] features an estimate of 'Tariffs Charged to the USA' by other countries that nobody could figure out, until a financial journalist realized it was just how much we export to that country, minus how much we import, divided by how much we import."

dalton99a
(88,226 posts)12. "has no foundation in either economic theory or trade law"