Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
James Carver spent 36 years in prison. But after reviewing new scientific evidence, a judge set him free.
https://theappeal.org/james-carver-released-longform/Some of you may remember the fire at the Elliott Chambers House in Massachusetts that killed 15 people in 1984.
But at a hearing in April, these crucial claims were debunked by Craig Beyler, a retired fire-safety engineer who reviewed the case for Carver’s legal team.
Beyler said the investigator’s testimony about “alligator charring” and “swirling smoke” was based on ‘80s-era myths scientists have since rejected. He added that the fact that the lab tests were all negative meant that the investigator’s conclusion was “mere speculation.” And the idea that fire cannot travel downward, he explained, was also false.
Beyler said investigators failed to collect enough evidence to rule out electrical causes. He said the blaze’s cause could not be determined. However, he said that scientific testing has shown it would have been impossible for the newspapers to have generated a flame powerful enough to have spread to the building.
Beyler said the fire did not start at ground level, but instead began in the overhang of the alcove where the newspapers were found. The damage to the alcove’s walls was limited. But the fire had so significantly damaged the overhang that pieces of the ceiling were missing. He said the damage to the walls and newspapers could have been caused by “drop-down burning,” which is when flaming debris falls from a higher level of a structure to a lower one.
Beyler said the investigator’s testimony about “alligator charring” and “swirling smoke” was based on ‘80s-era myths scientists have since rejected. He added that the fact that the lab tests were all negative meant that the investigator’s conclusion was “mere speculation.” And the idea that fire cannot travel downward, he explained, was also false.
Beyler said investigators failed to collect enough evidence to rule out electrical causes. He said the blaze’s cause could not be determined. However, he said that scientific testing has shown it would have been impossible for the newspapers to have generated a flame powerful enough to have spread to the building.
Beyler said the fire did not start at ground level, but instead began in the overhang of the alcove where the newspapers were found. The damage to the alcove’s walls was limited. But the fire had so significantly damaged the overhang that pieces of the ceiling were missing. He said the damage to the walls and newspapers could have been caused by “drop-down burning,” which is when flaming debris falls from a higher level of a structure to a lower one.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
