General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocratic Senator Gillibrand Goes on Islamophobic Rant Against Mamdani
Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) went on an Islamophobic rant against New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani in a radio interview on Thursday, spewing lies about Mamdani and suggesting that he would represent a threat to public safety if elected.
In an appearance on WYNCs Brian Lehrer Show, the senator repeated numerous lies about Mamdani, echoing oft-repeated bigoted statements made about Palestinians and the pro-Palestine movement.
During the segment, kicked off by a call-in question by a listener, Gillibrand said that Mamdani, who is Muslim, is dangerous and supports violence, citing his refusal to condemn the phrase globalize the intifada and equating the words intifada and jihad to fear monger about them.
Her statements were completely removed from reality, and clearly informed by some of the worst hatred spread against Arabs, Muslims, and Palestinians in particular over the past decades. For instance, Gillibrand said that just the phrase global intifada with intifada meaning uprising or rebellion in Arabic is violent and destructive.
https://truthout.org/articles/democratic-senator-gillibrand-goes-on-islamophobic-rant-against-mamdani/
Just another reason I can't stand her

Prairie Gates
(5,462 posts)
Ping Tung
(2,859 posts)It looks like she has taken up the motto "The end justifies the means" campaign style.
Fiendish Thingy
(19,807 posts)La Coliniere
(1,459 posts)She wants to degrade the Democratic candidates campaign while she gives her support to the cryptocurrency industryand its newly made millionaires. Gillibrand is a problem that continues to persist.
Jilly_in_VA
(12,267 posts)if I lived in NY. As it is, I'll send them $$ from VA.
SocialDemocrat61
(5,055 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(19,807 posts)Emile
(35,529 posts)progressoid
(51,526 posts)rubbersole
(9,993 posts)BlueKota
(4,338 posts)and we still have the right to vote, I hope she is primaried, and I will vote for her primary challenger. She's played the "bipartisan" card far too often, voted with the Republicons on things I thought she should have voted against, and now generating negative press for the party. Not to mention the past Al Franken incident.
If she's the 2030 candidate in the general election I would still vote for her against a Republicon, but I really hope she doesn't get the Democratic nomination then. I want someone who stands up for her constituents not someone who wants to be buddies with the opposing party.