Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(66,005 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2025, 10:31 PM Jun 30

Federal judge seeks clarity on whether birthright citizenship order means babies could be deported

Source: Associated Press

Federal judge seeks clarity on whether birthright citizenship order means babies could be deported

By MICHAEL KUNZELMAN
Updated 4:59 PM EDT, June 30, 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Monday questioned when the Trump administration will try to enforce its birthright citizenship executive order and asked if the government would attempt to deport U.S.-born children of people who are in the country illegally or temporarily before restrictions on birthright citizenship might take effect in late July.

Justice Department attorney Brad Rosenberg told U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman that the administration doesn’t intend to deport any children covered by President Donald Trump’s executive while the Supreme Court has suspended its enforcement for 30 days. He called it a “hypothetical” question.

The judge gave Rosenberg until Tuesday to submit a written summary of what the administration believes it “can and can’t do” after last Friday’s Supreme Court ruling. She asked if the government would be “seeking to deport babies” before July 26. The judge said her question referred to children who were born after Feb. 19 and are covered by Trump’s executive order but aren’t plaintiffs in litigation challenging the order.

“No,” Rosenberg said. “I just want to be clear. I am responding to the court’s characterization of what it believes the United States might do after 30 days from the date of the Supreme Court’s decision. But, again, I would note that (federal agencies) have all been tasked with developing guidelines for implementation of the executive order. So I view that as a hypothetical.”

-snip-

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-birthright-citizenship-supreme-court-dec3f7359c83615b3edbc2f2b45f09c1

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge seeks clarity on whether birthright citizenship order means babies could be deported (Original Post) Eugene Jun 30 OP
Judge asks liars to tell the truth BOSSHOG Jun 30 #1
K&R spanone Jun 30 #2
Since pedo Trump is not verifying if people are citizens or not Farmer-Rick Jul 1 #3
By saying that Trump could develop guidelines to implement his EO, isn't the SC tacitly saying he can deport citizens? Lonestarblue Jul 1 #4
Executive Orders override the Constitution? The next Democratic President, if ever, should abolish the Electoral College Marcuse Jul 1 #5
The South End of a Northbound Yak... GiqueCee Jul 1 #9
Nah Hornedfrog2000 Jul 1 #10
Do both parents have to be citizens or just one? efhmc Jul 1 #6
Just one. GiqueCee Jul 1 #8
Thanks for the answer. efhmc Jul 1 #12
No, nooooo. Of course not JMCKUSICK Jul 1 #7
He wont need to Hornedfrog2000 Jul 1 #11

Farmer-Rick

(11,890 posts)
3. Since pedo Trump is not verifying if people are citizens or not
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 09:33 AM
Jul 1

What does it matter??????

If a Nazi sees a person of color, or hears someone who has an accent, they and all their children, babies or Not, are going to be locked up.

So what's the use of clarification? Pedo Trump and his goons are all criminal liars. Do you think he's going to follow any restrictions to his Hitler power???

This is all just for show so the dancing Supremes can pretend the law matters and keep their jobs and comfy lives. The law doesn't matter at all anymore.

Just like in China, Russia and North Korea, there is no applicable law if some Nazi gets aroused to do something illegal. America now has kangaroo courts and whims of a dick tater to follow.

It's ridiculous that the Supremes think they are even relevant anymore. Pedo Trump is going to shut them down soon. They'll still get paid and get to wear long black robes but their opinions will be totally useless. Dick taters don't need judges. They need enforcers.

Lonestarblue

(12,846 posts)
4. By saying that Trump could develop guidelines to implement his EO, isn't the SC tacitly saying he can deport citizens?
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 09:48 AM
Jul 1

He is denying birthright citizenship for children of undocumented parents in violation of the 14th Amendment. Miller would be gleeful to rip babies from their parents and deport them to separate countries or even to jails in El Salvador. He loved putting babies and toddlers in cages during Trump’s first term.

Marcuse

(8,579 posts)
5. Executive Orders override the Constitution? The next Democratic President, if ever, should abolish the Electoral College
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 11:54 AM
Jul 1

GiqueCee

(2,611 posts)
9. The South End of a Northbound Yak...
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 04:00 PM
Jul 1

... CANNOT legally rescind a Constitutional Amendment. But then, since when did "'legal" mean a fuckin' thing to a Republican?

Hornedfrog2000

(439 posts)
10. Nah
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 04:23 PM
Jul 1

You just make an EO to rescind right before it is set to happen, and the SC make it work out for the president, either way 😉. Unless youre a dem president of course.

JMCKUSICK

(3,314 posts)
7. No, nooooo. Of course not
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 12:07 PM
Jul 1

That and we're not cutting Medicaid, SNAP or dozens of other things except defense of course.
On a side note, I'm sure that Trump will try to get the military to go full Maga by threatening draconian cuts and the game show type contest to which branch will run his new SS.

Hornedfrog2000

(439 posts)
11. He wont need to
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 04:24 PM
Jul 1

He fired all the generals, and as long as you give 100% allegience to trump, you get to keep your job. This country is so fucked.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal judge seeks clari...