General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's War on Gay, Lesbian, and Trans People

And on LGBTQ rights, the Republican platform, at Trumps request, did not propose ending marriage equality. All of this was a classic Trump feint.
Trumps administration has worked with state officials on vigilante laws intended to punish people who seek reproductive care out of state. He has redoubled the attempt to deny federal funds to Planned Parenthood. Trumps appointees keep trying to ban medications that induce abortion, the safest and most widespread method.
And the attack on gay and trans people keeps escalating. On Inauguration Day, Trump declared that only two genders, male and female, would be recognized going forward by the federal government. He signed an executive order to that effect within hours of being sworn in.
Trump has used supposed DEI excesses to attack gay and lesbian people per se, much as he has used the DEI ruse to purge Black people from senior posts. He has banned trans people from serving in the armed forces. Last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth changed the name of the US Navy ship named for Harvey Milk, the gay San Francisco mayor who was gunned down in his office in 1978. Milk was a navy veteran.
https://prospect.org/civil-rights/2025-07-01-trump-lgbt-rights-scott-bessent/

Fiendish Thingy
(20,226 posts)These sensible centrists say Dems can only win if they campaign on kitchen table issues like jobs and inflation, and shouldnt focus on the basic human rights everyone is entitled to.
I say fuck that shit.
AZJonnie
(1,109 posts)than explicitly and pointedly campaigning for basic human rights for any one group that doesn't necessarily enjoy them ATM, in my estimation, because there are actually many groups that do not, and we want all their votes. I think back to a time not that long ago when Dems started referring to gay rights as 'civil rights', and this did not go over very well in some important quarters, so you don't hear Democrats doing that anymore. Just an example of the 'balance' that's politically important to strike.
The works you actually do in office are more important than stump speeches and platforms, and you will not be able to get nearly as many good works towards the LGBTQ+ cause done if you never actually win your election. So, of course, as Democrats go through their terms and participate in legislation, I expect them to absolutely support LGBTQ+ empowerment and equal rights under the law, but that's a little bit separate in my mind from 'what they campaign on' if that makes sense?
W_HAMILTON
(9,388 posts)The veteran Vermont senator accused the liberal elite in America of using the inclusion of marginalised communities, such as Black or LGBTQ+ people, as a way to make issues seem difficult to understand.
We get to this thing called identity politics, youre Black, youre tremendous, youre wonderful. Youre gay, youre the greatest thing on Earth, rather than say: what do you stand for? the former Democrat, who now sits as an independent, said.
...
Is every gay person brilliant or wonderful or great? No, of course not, everyones a human being. The issue is: what do you stand for? And that gets you back to the issue we discussed earlier: class politics.
Sanders said discussion of these topics, especially among Democrats, helped ignore the real question, which is: which side are you on?
Are you going to stand with working families? he asked. Are you going to raise the minimum wage to a living wage? Are you going to fight to guarantee healthcare for all people, or not? Are you going to demand that the wealthiest people [pay] their fair share of taxes, or not?
Those are the issues. No one cares what colour you are or what your gender is.
Taken from: https://www.thepinknews.com/2025/05/22/bernie-sanders-podcast-identity-politics/
Fiendish Thingy
(20,226 posts)I dont hear anyone on the left, save for Sanders, advising against supporting the LGBT community.
Also, the centrists who want to abandon the LGBT community do not favor raising the minimum wage, universal healthcare, or raising taxes on the wealthiest as Sanders does. They seek bipartisan compromise, which, because of the filibuster, will never happen unless it is on the Republicans terms.
W_HAMILTON
(9,388 posts)The vast majority of Democrats support all of those things. Hell, the Democratic House already passed a minimum wage increase, but Republicans refused to take it up in the Senate. When Democrats controlled both chambers, it was brought up again, and the vast majority of Democrats voted for it, but a small handful did not -- remember former progressive Sinema's little curtsy? -- and it failed.
PS - That news article I linked came from a podcast interview Sanders was doing with an alt right bro type. I guess ALL SIDES think they can win over Republicans, but fact of the matter is, at the end of the day, Republicans will vote for Republicans.
Fiendish Thingy
(20,226 posts)But not all Dem politicians do.
Johonny
(24,275 posts)Unfortunately, the hatred of the LBGTQ community in America is heavy. And worse, people voted for that over their own well being. It is rather frightening
Johnny2X2X
(23,128 posts)I think not making the cause of trans people so front and center was the ask. And whether you agree with that idea or not, doing whatever it took to win was the only way to protect the LGTBQ from the onslaught they currently face. Dems are no powerless to help because they lost.