There is a discussion here today on the impeachment vs expulsion of a member of congress. This because of another.....

[FadedMullet]

......ridiculous statement by Trump. Expulsion is something done according to Congress' own rules. Makes me wonder if the rules of Congress can be appealed in the courts. Is it a question of Separation of Powers? Seems that the Constitution and the Voters of a state decide who they want to sit in Congress, why should they be refused a seat? Maybe the Supreme Court has dabbled in this issue before? Good luck with that today. Maybe I'll look up Adam Clayton Powell just for fun.

If you really have the goods on this question, try not to pontificate too much, as some do here on the underground.

[Fiendish Thingy]

1. The courts have no jurisdiction over Congressional processes

That’s your separation of powers.

[tritsofme]

2. The Constitution specifies the threshold for expulsion, not rules set by Congress.

The decision of either chamber to expel a member is final, and not reviewable by the courts.

However Congress may not refuse to seat a member who validly won his election for arbitrary reasons.

[FadedMullet]

4. Thanks.

[leftstreet]

3. Disgraced members were once expected to resign

ethics violations
bribery, fraud
sexual misconduct

But career politicians and judges seem to have nothing to fear, and decorum and professionalism are out the window