Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Figarosmom

(12,988 posts) Tue Apr 28, 2026, 10:38 PM Apr 28

Hawk's podcast - trumps base - this why we have THIS

?si=bsE8-QK9_3QAX5cC

And the guy asking why a woman doesn't have to have a DNA test to determine if s he she's the mother actually thinks it's a good question.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hawk's podcast - trumps base - this why we have THIS (Original Post) Figarosmom Apr 28 OP

Well, there have a been a few cases where kids were raised by someone they thought was their biological mom, mwmisses4289 Apr 28 #1

He's not talking about those types of cases clearly. Figarosmom Apr 28 #3

Yikes. Marie Marie Apr 28 #2

mwmisses4289

(4,589 posts)

1. Well, there have a been a few cases where kids were raised by someone they thought was their biological mom,

Reply to Figarosmom (Original post)

Tue Apr 28, 2026, 11:01 PM

Apr 28

then they did a DNA test and discovered she wasn't. Usually involved kidnapping and missing children.

Figarosmom

(12,988 posts)

3. He's not talking about those types of cases clearly.

Reply to mwmisses4289 (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 28, 2026, 11:35 PM

Apr 28

He acts like he had to prove he wasn't the father to a child and is wondering why the female that named him isn't required. It never occurred to him that the baby coming out of her is proof enough.

Marie Marie

(11,458 posts)

2. Yikes.

Reply to Figarosmom (Original post)

Tue Apr 28, 2026, 11:21 PM

Apr 28

Reply to this discussion