Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(95,105 posts)
Wed Apr 29, 2026, 10:19 PM Apr 29

The Supreme Court has all but killed the law that helped kill Jim Crow

Last edited Thu Apr 30, 2026, 01:28 AM - Edit history (1)

https://www.ms.now/opinion/louisiana-callais-voting-rights-act-supreme-court-black-voters

The Supreme Court has all but killed the law that helped kill Jim Crow
The Supreme Court gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and opened the door to racial gerrymanders across the South and Southwest.
Apr. 29, 2026, 8:42 PM EDT
By Stacey Abrams

The Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais is a direct hit to the heart of the Voting Rights Act and to the fragile promise that every American’s vote should carry equal weight. The VRA ended Jim Crow. Full stop. With this decision, it’s open season — once again — on Black and brown voters at the ballot box.

In 2023, the Supreme Court instructed Alabama to finally draw fair maps to create two majority-Black constitutional districts to allow Black citizens a shot at equal representation. Today, that same Supreme Court ruled that Louisiana’s two majority-Black congressional districts are unconstitutional — and in doing so, gutted Section 2 of the VRA, opening the door to racial gerrymanders across the South and Southwest.

Let’s first understand what the VRA is. After the Civil War, the 13th Amendment banned slavery (mostly). The 14th Amendment granted birthright citizenship (for now). And the 15th Amendment barred the federal government and the states from denying the right to vote based on race, color and servitude (in theory). But until the fairly recent year of 1965, the 15th Amendment was routinely ignored by Southern states using the legal mechanism of Jim Crow.

Poll taxes, literacy tests and language restrictions were the most visible tools of voter suppression. However, Black voters who successfully navigated those hurdles still faced the ignominy of not having a real choice. Hostile political regimes drew the boundaries of voting lines and districts to make it impossible for Black and brown voters to elect anyone who represented their interests. Enter the Voting Rights Act.

Section 2 of that act made it illegal to design districts to dilute or block racial communities from finding common cause. It also required a corrective action: When populations routinely boxed out of meaningful participation hit a certain threshold, political districts should reflect their growing power. Thus, political leaders couldn’t use maps as weapons to permanently silence the voices of people of color.

...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/29/us/supreme-court-voting-rights#civil-rights-leaders-see-the-voting-rights-ruling-as-a-betrayal


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Supreme Court has all but killed the law that helped kill Jim Crow (Original Post) dalton99a Apr 29 OP
Nice court, Roberts. johnnyfins Apr 29 #1
I hope... 2naSalit Apr 29 #3
K&R 2naSalit Apr 29 #2
Thanks alot drumphf voters, and Those Who DIDN'T Vote in 2024 for VP Harris! electric_blue68 Apr 29 #4
An old attorney friend of mine used to tell me that one of the most important LoisB Apr 30 #6
TY. It's something I didn't pay that much attention to when.... electric_blue68 Apr 30 #7
For those that were not around pre-1965, this nation is heading that way and they are making good progress. walkingman Apr 29 #5

johnnyfins

(3,942 posts)
1. Nice court, Roberts.
Wed Apr 29, 2026, 10:51 PM
Apr 29

Take your legacy and shove it up your robe. Hope your reward and/or your temporary safety from TSFs threat machine are worth it.

electric_blue68

(27,183 posts)
4. Thanks alot drumphf voters, and Those Who DIDN'T Vote in 2024 for VP Harris!
Wed Apr 29, 2026, 11:39 PM
Apr 29

Maybe this would have happened without drumphf being reelected...

But certainly having drumphf in in his first term gave us ? Coney-Barret, and Kavanaugh vs Hillary's potential nominees.
Arg!!!!

LoisB

(13,326 posts)
6. An old attorney friend of mine used to tell me that one of the most important
Thu Apr 30, 2026, 12:57 AM
Apr 30

factors in voting for a governor or President is what kind of judges you think that person would appoint.

electric_blue68

(27,183 posts)
7. TY. It's something I didn't pay that much attention to when....
Thu Apr 30, 2026, 01:04 AM
Apr 30

I was younger.

I probably could pay more attention still with local judges.
I always voted for Democrats which included judges.

Still i did my own election flyers back in the '00s. I put up in my neighborhood, one being did people want so and on the SC in the future *if* a Republican was elected President.

walkingman

(11,101 posts)
5. For those that were not around pre-1965, this nation is heading that way and they are making good progress.
Wed Apr 29, 2026, 11:56 PM
Apr 29

Last edited Thu Apr 30, 2026, 12:32 AM - Edit history (1)

Much like Climate Change it is happening right before our eyes and yet people don't seem to think it is a big deal....☮

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Supreme Court has all...