MaddowBlog-The problem(s) with Team Trump's new price tag for the war with Iran
The Pentagon finally answered the question about the financial cost of the Iran war. But is the estimate believable?
The good news is that the Pentagon, after two months of avoiding the question, finally shared a price tag for the war in Iran.
The bad news is that the administrationâs figure is very hard to believe.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-04-30T21:29:19.627Z
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/the-problems-with-team-trumps-new-price-tag-for-the-war-in-iran
The list of questions surrounding the war with Iran is not short, but one of the nagging lines of inquiry involves its price tag: What exactly is this war of choice costing American taxpayers?....
More than two months after Donald Trump approved the military offensive, the Republican administration finally gave the public a dollar amount. MS NOW reported, as part of Wednesdays live blog coverage:
Jules Hurst III, the chief financial officer of the Defense Department, said Trumps war on Iran has cost the United States about $25 billion so far, most of which has been spent on munitions.
Hurst said the Pentagon will submit a supplemental funding request to Congress once we have the full assessment of the cost of the conflict.
.....A related question, meanwhile, hangs overhead: Is $25 billion a reliable figure, especially given the early daily estimates?
MS NOWs Chris Hayes noted during Wednesdays hearing that
it seems a near-certainty that the estimate is way, way too low.
Soon after, a CNN report based on three sources noted that the $25 billion estimate
is a lowball figure that does not include the cost of repairing extensive damage suffered by US bases in the region.
During the hearing, Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California voiced skepticism of the stated price tag, calling the estimate totally off. Put another way, its probably best to take the $25 billion figure with a grain of salt as the debate continues.