General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Free Speech" huh? I got completely booted off Twitter
I wasnt doing or posting anything that I wouldnt do on DU. I was trolling MAGA influencers but only with published and reported facts
and some memes (like on DU)
. but thats it.

bucolic_frolic
(56,337 posts)MichMan
(17,632 posts)People get banned or posts get removed here on DU daily.
dpibel
(4,043 posts)Surprisingly, the phrase "free speech" is not limited to the First Amendment.
Elon Musk proclaimed himself a "free speech absolutist".
Comparisons between the self-description and what happens on Twitter seem entirely apt.
ToxMarz
(3,188 posts)That's why he champions (encourages?) the right of Nazi's and racist's to post freely on X. It doesn't neccessariy have anyting to do with the First Amendment. He didn't say he lost his First Ammendment rights, I think he was more caling out Musk's hypocrisy.
Scrivener7
(60,379 posts)But doesn't it feel good to stop being a product he can use for his own purposes?
yardwork
(69,977 posts)Reminds me of Eastern Europe during the Cold War.
EdmondDantes_
(2,285 posts)Getting suspended on Twitter is hardly the government throwing someone in jail.
yardwork
(69,977 posts)DU is a small platform openly dedicated to a single issue: electing Democrats. Twitter is the largest communication platform in the world, and its owner, the wealthiest man in the world, helped get Trump elected and led the effort to destroy federal agencies.
Twitter banning people for the kinds of things they post on DU is chilling.
It's weird to me that you don't see the difference.
EdmondDantes_
(2,285 posts)How many members does a site need before they aren't allowed to ban people? Reddit, Facebook, Bluesky all ban people.
And you're taking the poster's word they didn't say anything they couldn't say here. Without seeing the post(s) in question, that's a leap of faith.
yardwork
(69,977 posts)ret5hd
(22,718 posts)ananda
(35,825 posts)I believe in boycotting all compromised media.
Goonch
(5,983 posts)
DFW
(60,822 posts)No wonder they retaliated.
ret5hd
(22,718 posts)just move on.
MustLoveBeagles
(18,339 posts)Sorry you were booted for telling the truth.
niyad
(135,359 posts)not being allowed to limit our speech, not private entities.
underpants
(197,834 posts)* by the right wing media and the rest of the media that follows.
niyad
(135,359 posts)number of times I have had to explain this to people in personal conversations.
underpants
(197,834 posts)and informed people.
niyad
(135,359 posts)twodogsbarking
(19,861 posts)GiqueCee
(5,072 posts)... totally devoid of any redeeming qualities whatsoever. Being a completely amoral psychopath is how he got so rich. You can fling all manner of poo at Dems and progressives on X, but whisper the slightest criticism of conservative snowflakes and you're gone.
The lines to piss on his grave will be long, indeed, so get your tickets now!
MineralMan
(152,049 posts)on private forums. Think about who owns what used to be Twitter. He can do whatever he wants. It's his website.
Just go somewhere else. I canceled my account on Twitter the day Musk walked in carry8ing a kitchen sink.
dpibel
(4,043 posts)The point is the hypocrisy.
Elon proclaimed himself a free speech absolutist. He is not.
Simple as that.
Nobody on this thread, that I can see, is claiming that there is some sort of prohibition against Musk censoring.
It is, however, noteworthy that he's the one who claimed to be reestablishing unbridled free speech.
I actually do not think this is such a difficult concept.
canetoad
(21,218 posts)Will you cope?