Ohio Votes Cast for Green Party Candidate Won't Count Due to VP Swap
Source: US News and World Report/AP
Sept. 25, 2024, at 5:22 p.m.
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) Votes cast in Ohio for Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein will not count because the party nominated her running mate after a state administrative deadline, according to state election officials.
Stein, who filed to run as an independent presidential candidate in Ohio because the Green Party lost state recognition several years ago, will still appear on state ballots, said Dan Lusheck, a spokesman for the Ohio Secretary of State's office, told Cleveland.com. The state started sending out ballots last week to overseas and military voters.
When Stein filed to run for president in Ohio, she listed Anita Rios the Green Partys 2014 nominee for Ohio governor as her running mate. However, Rios name was only submitted as a placeholder until the Green Party nominated Butch Ware as Stein's running mate at their national convention Aug. 17.
When Rios notified the Ohio secretary of states office in late August that she was pulling her name from the ballot in favor of Ware, the office accepted her withdrawal but refused to add Wares name in her place. Philena Farley, co-chair of the Ohio Green Party, told the newspaper that the office said the change could not be made because the state deadline to replace an independent vice-presidential candidate on the 2024 ballot was Aug. 12.
Read more: https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2024-09-25/ohio-votes-cast-for-green-party-candidate-wont-count-due-to-vp-swap
Voltaire2
(14,700 posts)Our stupid system makes third party votes and non-votes equivalent. In some better future we require a majority to win.
will be less likely to vote for a dud candidate.
Voltaire2
(14,700 posts)Stein wasnt going to win. The vast majority of Green Party voters arent going to switch to Harris or Trump.
FarPoint
(13,607 posts)Dedicated politicians in Ohio are dwindling....this time the job was done correctly and timely...
Stpblk
(2 posts)Shes just a friggin spoiler anyway
LetMyPeopleVote
(154,352 posts)marble falls
(62,041 posts)... opportunity to be VPOTUS.
The problem I have with the Greens is:
1. They aren't the Democratic Party.
2. When I looked into the Greens, there were as many RWers as lefties, at least here in Texas.
The older I get the better democratic socialism looks.
Best_man23
(5,122 posts)Just saying.
Vinca
(51,007 posts)We have a two-party system, not a parliamentary system. Some people don't seem to grasp that.
Ray Bruns
(4,583 posts)Voltaire2
(14,700 posts)If they are on the ballot. We dont have a two party system we have a plurality election system. That does of course tend to institutionalize two parties, but it is only a tendency, and in our past new major parties have emerged. Also the UK is a parliamentary system and also uses plurality elections, and also has two major parties.
Vinca
(51,007 posts)you join either the Democratic or Republican side. Your clout is nonexistent if you don't. You're just a seat filler. In countries with parliamentary systems you might get proportional power. Here you get zip.
Voltaire2
(14,700 posts)In countries with proportional representation, smaller parties can be part of ruling coalitions. A parliamentary system does not require proportional representation. The UK has a parliamentary system and plurality elections, and no proportional representation, and consequently two major parties.
sdfernando
(5,378 posts)the U.S., technically, does have a multi-party system. Just that there have only really ever been two dominant political parties...so for practical purposes, yes, we are a two-party system.
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,872 posts)ever again - along with Frump.