Kremlin says reports of Trump-Putin call about Ukraine are 'pure fiction'
Source: The Guardian
The Kremlin has denied reports that the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, spoke to the US president-elect, Donald Trump, calling the media reports pure fiction.
The Washington Post first reported that a call had taken place, citing unidentified sources, and said Trump had told Putin he should not escalate the Ukraine war. Reuters also reported on a call.
It is completely untrue. It is pure fiction; it is simply false information, the Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, said when asked about the call. There was no conversation.
This is the most obvious example of the quality of the information that is being published now, sometimes even in fairly reputable publications.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/11/kremlin-denies-reports-of-trump-putin-call-about-ukraine-invasion
Meadowoak
(6,214 posts)Lovie777
(14,986 posts)Faux pas
(15,360 posts)ck4829
(35,895 posts)Remember when Michael Flynn got booted from his position of national security advisor after 28 days? He said he did not discuss sanctions with Russia, Russia said they did in fact discuss sanctions.
mitch96
(14,645 posts)meow2u3
(24,918 posts)Don't believe anything coming from the Kremlin. If they denied it, they supplied it.
thesquanderer
(12,338 posts)I mean, uncharacteristically, in this case, ONE of them must actually be telling the truth for a change! It's hard to know who to disbelieve more...
Igel
(36,075 posts)Putin's words have no truth value. They are neither necessarily lies nor are they necessarily true. He says what he needs to accomplish his goals, as he sees them.
"He says it's a lie, so it must be true" is an incorrect deduction. "He says it's a lie, so that claim must serve his interests." If it *were* a lie and he said it was a lie, it would be true; but he'd only say it if it served his interests.
Anonymous people made the claim, saying they had knowledge of the situation. Were they reporting on what one other person claimed? Were they both independent witnesses of the conversation? Did they hear it from Trump? What's the quality of the source? Do they have an incentive (or does their source) to be in error as far as the truth is concerned?
Note that Trump's spokesperson, it was claimed by MSM today, just said "no comment" to the query as to the accuracy of the report. So it's completely unclear that they contradict each other. "Lie" and "not saying" don't really much interact.
thesquanderer
(12,338 posts)and a spokesperson for the other side said no such conversation occurred. And in this case, neither side clearly has more credibility than the other. That was my point, and I'm not sure what (if anything) you're disagreeing with there.
That said, the report from the Trump side was from an unidentified source, which lowers that side's credibility further. And I also have a hard time envisioning Trump quietly telling Putin what to do or not do.
Lovie777
(14,986 posts)Russia and other dictators will know all about our security.
joanbarnes
(1,882 posts)oasis
(51,696 posts)GB_RN
(3,151 posts)With guys like Poutine and Cantaloupe Caligula the Corpulent, you can be sure that when they vehemently protest and deny, then they are guilty as fuck with respect to the allegation(s).
So, pure fiction means it definitely happened.
lastlib
(24,883 posts)If those two say it's pure fiction, then it's bound to be TRUTH.
Another "perfect phone call."......
riversedge
(73,100 posts)billcomp1
(7 posts)I would believe him about as much as I believe the Republicans who are sycophants for Mr. Trump
riversedge
(73,100 posts)Kremlin Insists Trump and Putins War Call Didnt Happen
PURE FICTION
https://www.thedailybeast.com/kremlin-insists-donald-trump-and-vladimir-putins-ukraine-war-call-didnt-happen/
Will Neal Published 11.11.24 6:09AM EST
The Kremlin has denied reports that Donald Trump spoke with Vladimir Putin following Trumps election victory.
Anadolu/Getty Images
The Kremlin has fiercely denied reports that Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin have already held a call on Ukraine in the days since Trumps election victory. This is completely untrue. This is pure fiction, its just false information, Putins spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Monday, according to Reuters. This is the most obvious example of the quality of the information that is being published now, sometimes even in fairly reputable publications, he added, apparently in reference to the Washington Post story over the weekend saying Trump and Putin spoke last Thursday. The newspaper reported Trump took the call from one of his resorts in Florida, and that the president-elect advised the Russian premier against escalating the war in Ukraine with a view toward resolving the conflict soon. The latest denial comes after Peskov last month also denied claims in a book by Watergate journalist Bob Woodward about Trump and Putin speaking several times after the end of Trumps first term. Peskov nevertheless confirmed the books claim that Trump gifted COVID testing equipment to Putin while in office.
Read it at Reuters
riversedge
(73,100 posts)On 14 June, Putin staked out a maximalist position for an end to the war: Ukraine would have to drop its Nato ambitions and withdraw all its troops from all the territory of four regions claimed by Russia.........
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/11/kremlin-denies-reports-of-trump-putin-call-about-ukraine-invasion