Trump administration invokes state secrets privilege in case over deportations under wartime law
Source: Associated Press via the Toronto Star
Trump administration invokes state secrets privilege in case over deportations under wartime law
The judge ruled that immigrants facing deportation must get an opportunity to challenge their designations as alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang.
March 24, 2025
3 min read
By Michael Kunzelman And Lindsay Whitehurst The Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Trump administration on Monday invoked a "state secrets privilege" and refused to give a federal judge any additional information about the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador under an 18th century wartime law -- a case that has become a flashpoint amid escalating tension with the federal courts.
The declaration comes as Chief Judge James Boasberg weighs whether the government defied his order to turn around planes carrying migrants after he blocked deportations of people alleged to be gang members without due process.
He has asked for details about when the planes landed and who was on board, information that the Trump administration asserts would harm "diplomatic and national security concerns." … Government attorneys also asked an appeals court on Monday to lift Boasberg’s order and allow deportations to continue, a push that appeared to divide the judges.
Circuit Court Judge Patricia Millett said Nazis detained in the U.S. during World World II received better legal treatment than Venezuelan immigrants who were were deported to El Salvador this month under the same statute.
{snip}
Read more: https://www.thestar.com/news/world/united-states/trump-administration-invokes-state-secrets-privilege-in-case-over-deportations-under-wartime-law/article_ac2b2abc-840a-5688-a94b-c19fedb9fbdf.html
I heard this on the 8:00 p.m. CBS Radio News on WTOP.
This showed up at around the same time:
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Follow
BREAKING: Trump administration invokes "state secrets privilege" over questions from Chief Judge Boasberg into whether the government violated the classwide TRO blocking removals under Trump's Alien Enemies Act proclamation. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436.56.0.pdf
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
J.G.G., et al.,
Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00766
Plaintiffs-Petitioners,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the Linited Siates, Defendants-Respondents.
NOTICE INVOKING STATE SECRETS PRIVILEGE
The Executive Branch hereby notifies the Court that no further information will be
provided in response to the Court's March 18, 2025 Minute Order based on the state secrets
privilege and the concurrently filed declarations of the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Homeland Security.
This is a case about the President's plenary authority, derived from Article II and the
mandate of the electorate, and reinforced by longstanding statute, to remove from the homeland
designated terrorists participating in a state-sponsored invasion of, and predatory incursion into,
the United States. The Court has all of the facts it needs to address the compliance issues before
it. Further intrusions on the Executive Branch would present dangerous and wholly unwarranted
separation-of-powers harms with respect to diplomatic and national security concerns that the
Court lacks competence to address. Accordingly, the states secrets privilege forecloses further
demands for details that have no place in this matter, and the government will address the Court's
order to show cause tomorrow by demonstrating that there is no basis for the suggestion of non-
compliance with any binding order.
ALT
Respectfully Submitted,
PAMELA J. BONDI
U.S. Attorney General
TODD BLANCHE
Deputy Attorney General
EMIL BOVE
Principal Associate Deputy
Attorney General
CHAD MIZELLE
Acting Associate Attorney General
YAAKOV M. ROTH
Acting Assistant Attorney General
s/ Drew C. Ensign
DREW C. ENSIGN
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20530
AUGUST E. FLENTJE
Acting Director
EREZ REUVENI
Assistant Director
BRIAN C. WARD
Acting Assistant Director
PATRICK GLEN
Senior Litigation Counsel
ALT
March 24, 2025 at 8:01 PM
https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social/post/3ll5xpksvp22x

C_U_L8R
(46,916 posts)I hope the judge gets a good laugh before he throws this out.
mahatmakanejeeves
(64,005 posts)BumRushDaShow
(150,042 posts)if that would apply.
The use of this old law is already ludicrous and illegal. There is NO WAR!
Prairie Gates
(4,694 posts)on personal phone chat channels.
Bozos.
choie
(5,294 posts)N/t
sakabatou
(44,436 posts)MichMan
(14,691 posts)Although no one was given a hearing or due process
58Sunliner
(5,540 posts)EndlessWire
(7,664 posts)you kind of got the feeling that the Justices were not impressed with the tap dance the rump attorney was doing. And, he said they were still weighing the merits of proceeding under the State Secret thing, so you kind of knew that's where they would go.
I think it's pretty obvious that trump broke the law here. And, I don't know how they will get those men back. We are not saying that they are not gang members. We are saying that they did not receive due process. Without that, rump can grab up anybody they want to and disappear them. So, the issue is DUE PROCESS.
This is a very important case that we need to win. Rump doesn't intend to tell anybody anything (except maybe the Atlantic publisher) and it's like a big "eff you" to the Appellate Court. I'd read that and I would be pissed.
bluestarone
(19,352 posts)I'm sure this judge knows it's BULLSHIT as well. We'll see.