Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(149,993 posts)
Thu Mar 27, 2025, 06:50 AM Mar 27

'Nonsense': Atlantic editor-in-chief blasts Trump administration 'smokescreens' on Signal chat

Source: ABC News

March 26, 2025, 7:12 PM


The Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg responded to the Trump administration's pushback over the publication's Monday article about a Signal chat discussing a U.S. attack on Houthis in Yemen it says was accidentally shared with Goldberg. Speaking to ABC News, Goldberg said The White House is engaging in a semantic game by focusing on his use of "attack plans" instead of "war plans" in his followup report, which was published on Wednesday.

"It's just all nonsense. It's nonsense. They're throwing up all these smokescreens to avoid being questioned about why they were so reckless as to have sensitive conversations like this in Signal, and why they invited a journalist and didn't even know that the journalist was there," he said on Wednesday. "I mean, war plan, attack plan. I mean, you know, it's just not nonsense talk, but attack is actually an accurate term for what they were doing."

Shortly after Wednesday's article was published, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X "these were NOT 'war plans.'" "The Atlantic has conceded: these were NOT 'war plans,'" Leavitt wrote. "This entire story was another hoax written by a Trump-hater who is well-known for his sensationalist spin." Goldberg told ABC News he and The Atlantic felt like they had to respond to the White House's attack on their credibility.

"And I thought, you know, at the end of the day, I thought, okay, let's let the people decide, read these messages, read the plain English, and decide if you think it's appropriate that the Secretary of Defense and the National Security Advisor to the President of the United States should be saying these things on a commercial, privately run messaging app that they're not allowed to use, and you and then make your decision," he said.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/nonsense-atlantic-editor-chief-blasts-trump-administration-smokescreens/story?id=120186247

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Nonsense': Atlantic editor-in-chief blasts Trump administration 'smokescreens' on Signal chat (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Mar 27 OP
Jeffrey Goldberg... littlemissmartypants Mar 27 #1
The gaslighting and obfuscation wears on my ragged nerves. AloeVera Mar 27 #2
That's the "What about?" tactic. usonian Mar 27 #3
Well they wern't "war plans" it was worse IbogaProject Mar 27 #4

littlemissmartypants

(27,069 posts)
1. Jeffrey Goldberg...
Thu Mar 27, 2025, 07:09 AM
Mar 27

Is a revered and experienced journalist. I highly respect him and would take him at his word.

I believe divine providence had a hand in this. It could not have happened to a better guy.

❤️

AloeVera

(2,421 posts)
2. The gaslighting and obfuscation wears on my ragged nerves.
Thu Mar 27, 2025, 07:59 AM
Mar 27

Suss out the one irrelevant "weakness" in a truth you don't like. Hammer away until your opponent adresses it. Then make the whole story about it and smear away. The truth and real story get lost in the smoke and mirrors.

This is how they do it. It's sickeningly dishonest.

IbogaProject

(4,195 posts)
4. Well they wern't "war plans" it was worse
Thu Mar 27, 2025, 08:09 AM
Mar 27

They shared "Strike Plans", which is even worse. This info was with specifics that could allow fairly direct locating of that carrier strike group. These verbal distractions are troubling, a teacher would be furious with a teenager trying to deflect responsibility with this line of reasoning.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Nonsense': Atlantic edit...