Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(149,731 posts)
Fri Mar 28, 2025, 03:12 PM Friday

Senate overturns overdraft fee limit despite opposition from consumer advocates

Source: Scripps News

Posted 11:46 AM, Mar 28, 2025
and last updated 12:05 PM, Mar 28, 2025


A limit on overdraft fees might not happen after all. The U.S. Senate voted Thursday to overturn a rule that would limit overdraft fees to $5. The rule applied to banks with at least $10 billion in assets. The resolution was approved 52-48 in a nearly party-line vote. Republican Sen. Josh Hawley was the only member of his caucus to vote against it. The overdraft protection regulation was published at the end of the Biden administration’s term and supported by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Lawmakers in the Senate voted to reverse it before it could come into effect. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott of South Carolina sponsored the resolution that would end the protection. A companion resolution has been introduced in the House of Representatives. Scott had criticized the Biden administration for approving rules within the CFPB in the two months between the presidential election and inauguration day. "It is paramount that President Trump can begin his administration on January 20th with a fresh slate to implement the economic agenda that the American people resoundingly voted for," Scott said in December.

Both resolutions to change overdraft fees are supported by the American Bankers Association. The American Bankers Association said the proposed changes would have forced many banks to eliminate overdraft protections, which it claims is a service consumers want. "Without access to overdraft protection, many Americans would be driven to less-regulated and higher-risk nonbank lenders to cover unexpected or emergency expenses," said ABA President and CEO Rob Nichols.

The Americans for Financial Reform said it was disappointed by Thursday's vote. “Today’s vote is a betrayal of families, service members, and working people who live paycheck to paycheck,” said Patrick Woodall, managing director for policy at Americans for Financial Reform. “Overdraft fees are nothing more than an attempt by big banks to pad their profits at the expense of consumers.”

Read more: https://www.scrippsnews.com/politics/congress/senate-overturns-overdraft-fee-limit-despite-opposition-from-consumer-advocates



This is a process permitted under the "Congressional Review Act" that gives Congress a final say on regulations adopted by the Executive Branch. It was something that Gingrich imposed with his Contract against America (although ironically, it has hurt the GOP more).

This is done by drafting and voting on a Resolution expressing disapproval. Both chambers would need to do so and then submit to the President for signing or vetoing. When you have opposite parties in control of the Presidency and Congress, the thing usually gets vetoed. On a rare occasion will a President accept it and sign it. But with all-party rule in this case, this will be a done deal.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate overturns overdraft fee limit despite opposition from consumer advocates (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Friday OP
F*ck Tim Scott: Chairman Tim Scott of South Carolina sponsored the resolution that would end the protection Demovictory9 Friday #1
There's a companion Resolution in the House BumRushDaShow Friday #2
Don't ever let a bank fleece you. AmericaUnderSiege Friday #3
"Joe Biden's old and what have Democrats done for me?" BaronChocula Friday #4

Demovictory9

(34,970 posts)
1. F*ck Tim Scott: Chairman Tim Scott of South Carolina sponsored the resolution that would end the protection
Fri Mar 28, 2025, 03:20 PM
Friday

Chairman Tim Scott of South Carolina sponsored the resolution that would end the protection

BumRushDaShow

(149,731 posts)
2. There's a companion Resolution in the House
Fri Mar 28, 2025, 04:20 PM
Friday

which I would assume would pass too, and 45 would sign it to make it so.

 

AmericaUnderSiege

(777 posts)
3. Don't ever let a bank fleece you.
Fri Mar 28, 2025, 04:21 PM
Friday

Be prepared to take maximum steps if they try, up to and including closing all accounts. You will help both yourself and the general public by reminding the bank of who is actually in control.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate overturns overdraf...