Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(152,122 posts)
Sun May 11, 2025, 04:48 AM 22 hrs ago

Hegseth sparks fears as he moves to ax generals

Source: The Hill

05/10/25 5:00 PM ET


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s move to ax the size of the U.S. military’s top ranks has triggered concerns of a political purge. Hegseth, who on Monday directed significant cuts to the U.S. military’s senior-most positions, has already fired several top leaders with no explanation. His latest plan could now eliminate roughly 100 generals and admirals, which he said was necessary to remove “redundant force structure” and streamline Pentagon bureaucracy.

But while it is true America’s forces are brass-heavy — with 37 four-star generals and admirals and about 816 officers with one-star and above — experts worry any move to slash those numbers will be done indiscriminately and without care for the institutional knowledge at the top that could be lost.

“We’re very concerned, especially with this administration, that this could easily turn into political testing or otherwise clearing out the ranks for political reasons,” said Greg Williams, the director of defense information at the nonprofit watchdog Project on Government Oversight.

“When a new administration comes in and makes a lot of changes, especially at the very top of the military ranks, especially for what are arguably very political reasons — are these officers ‘woke or or not?’ — that raises the concern that we’re undermining that nonpartisan tradition,” he added.

Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5293050-defense-secretary-hegseth-fires-top-leaders/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hegseth sparks fears as he moves to ax generals (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 22 hrs ago OP
Heg's Seth (R-plagiarist) is not fit for duty BoRaGard 22 hrs ago #1
imagine being a general or admiral and being fired by an alky talk show host rapist Skittles 22 hrs ago #2
we are where we are... Layzeebeaver 22 hrs ago #3
"are these officers 'woke' or or not?" GiqueCee 19 hrs ago #4
We had a whole lot of folks on DU several years ago who had no idea what "woke" was BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago #5
It is probably based on one question Bettie 19 hrs ago #6
This will backfire Chi67 18 hrs ago #7
A while ago I read an article on military numbers. Old Crank 17 hrs ago #8
Numbers: EX500rider 17 hrs ago #9
Interesting article. From the first "administration" I've been asking people if they felt that our own Firestorm49 16 hrs ago #10
Loyalty to the US or to the Constitution markodochartaigh 10 hrs ago #13
It's a purge and a step in the coup to make Putin the unelected ruler of the U.S. usonian 16 hrs ago #11
"...remove "redundant force structure" markodochartaigh 11 hrs ago #12

BoRaGard

(5,318 posts)
1. Heg's Seth (R-plagiarist) is not fit for duty
Sun May 11, 2025, 04:57 AM
22 hrs ago

as the republicon Draft-Dodger-in-chief and celebrated Golden Casino Hustler
demands of his submissive underlings.

Layzeebeaver

(1,936 posts)
3. we are where we are...
Sun May 11, 2025, 05:21 AM
22 hrs ago

the mid-terms will be the bellweather.

if the left gains, we might have a future,

otherwise... try to live on.

meanwhile, VOTE!

GiqueCee

(2,195 posts)
4. "are these officers 'woke' or or not?"
Sun May 11, 2025, 07:52 AM
19 hrs ago

99% of these witless skidmarks don't even know what "woke" means. Here's a reminder:

"[To be] aware of, and actively attentive to, important societal facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice)"

– Merriam Webster's Dictionary

Opposition to "woke" is blatant bigotry and racism, which cannot, and will not ever be forgiven.

BumRushDaShow

(152,122 posts)
5. We had a whole lot of folks on DU several years ago who had no idea what "woke" was
Sun May 11, 2025, 08:11 AM
19 hrs ago

and who were very vocally against use of the term despite many of us trying to explain it. This was happening during DeSatan's nonsense.

Bettie

(18,236 posts)
6. It is probably based on one question
Sun May 11, 2025, 08:24 AM
19 hrs ago

"will you be willing to order the killing US civilians in the US for the greater glory of dear leader?"

If they say "no" or "are you fucking kidding me here?" or anything but "of course, I've dreamed of this day, hail Donald Trump, hail MAGA", they will be gone.

Chi67

(1,195 posts)
7. This will backfire
Sun May 11, 2025, 09:18 AM
18 hrs ago

On this administration. Fucking with the military? Are they stupid? These are people who know how to fight. Bad idea.

Old Crank

(5,660 posts)
8. A while ago I read an article on military numbers.
Sun May 11, 2025, 10:29 AM
17 hrs ago

During WWII we had a huge number of enlisted men compared to upper level officers. I don't remember the numbers. Those numbers changed when the war ended to more upper officers to enlisted. Back again for Korea and Viet Nam.
During a war you need few officers in relationship to enlisted. During peace time you need more officers.

The theory being that it is harder to train the management group than the fighting forces. I think that is correct. I don't know what the precise ratio should be. We are in many small engagements and teh types of wars have changed. But to just rush in and hack is just as stupid as everything else this administration is doing.

EX500rider

(11,796 posts)
9. Numbers:
Sun May 11, 2025, 10:32 AM
17 hrs ago
In June 1945 the military had 2,068 generals and admirals on its rolls.
In March 1997 the services had 879 generals and admirals - for a total force only about one eighth the size of the 12 million-strong World War II force.

Firestorm49

(4,371 posts)
10. Interesting article. From the first "administration" I've been asking people if they felt that our own
Sun May 11, 2025, 10:51 AM
16 hrs ago

military would turn against us, hoping that that would never be the case. But by Hegseth’s actions to purge the “non-loyal” from the enlisted military to command positions in every branch, I’m afraid that the worst scenario could come into play. His loyalty comes down to complete and total control of every phase of our lives, carried out by brute military force.

markodochartaigh

(2,822 posts)
13. Loyalty to the US or to the Constitution
Sun May 11, 2025, 04:52 PM
10 hrs ago

used to be the standard. Now it is loyalty to Trump. I think that Louis XIV was said to have said it best, L'Etat, c'est moi.

usonian

(17,527 posts)
11. It's a purge and a step in the coup to make Putin the unelected ruler of the U.S.
Sun May 11, 2025, 11:24 AM
16 hrs ago
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220295160
Understand the coup plan. Expose it, Explain it and encourage everyone to do the right and appropriate thing to stop it

markodochartaigh

(2,822 posts)
12. "...remove "redundant force structure"
Sun May 11, 2025, 04:44 PM
11 hrs ago

So they are going to cut positions which are already mirrored in the Russian military?

/s

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hegseth sparks fears as h...