Federal court rules against attempt to withhold Endangered Species Act protections from Joshua tree

[BumRushDaShow]

Source: ABC News

May 14, 2025, 12:58 PM


A federal court in California sided with environmentalists, striking down a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) attempt to withhold protections for the Joshua tree under the Endangered Species Act. The Central District of California ruled on Monday that the FWS decision to not provide ESA protections for the Joshua tree is unlawful and sidesteps climate science. Known for its twisted stalks and unusual outline, the Joshua tree is native to the arid southwestern U.S. and thrives in harsh desert environments.

In 2015, WildEarth Guardians, an environmental nonprofit group, petitioned the FWS to list Joshua trees as a threatened species, but a second 2023 species status assessment by the FWS found that neither Joshua tree species -- Yucca brevifolia and Yucca jaegeriana -- requires protections. The FWS said it looked at threats from wildfire, invasive grasses, climate change and habitat loss and fragmentation. It found that none of the threats rose to the level to meet the definition of a threatened or endangered species throughout all or a significant portion of their ranges, according to the assessment.

"Through our scientific assessment, the Service determined that Joshua trees will remain an iconic presence on the landscape into the future. Although the two species do not need the protections of the Endangered Species Act, the Service cares deeply about Joshua trees and their roles in the desert environment," said Service Pacific Southwest Regional Director Paul Souza in a statement in 2023. "We are coordinating closely with partners to ensure the long-term conservation of these species, including the National Park Service and other Federal agencies, and the State of California, which is also considering measures for the protection of Joshua trees."


Joshua trees stand after sunrise in Joshua Tree National Park on February 20, 2025 near Joshua Tree, California.
Mario Tama/Getty Images

However, multiple studies have shown that shifts in climate in the Mojave Desert is a major contributor to weather events that threaten Joshua trees, including wildfires. "The agency’s decision, for a second time, reflected a massive disconnect from what the best available science shows -- that climate change and wildfire will prevent Joshua trees from successfully recruiting new generations over the coming years,” Jennifer Schwartz, managing attorney for WildEarth Guardians, said in a statement sent to ABC News.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/federal-court-rules-attempt-withhold-endangered-species-act/story?id=121792589

[Montauk6]

1. When TSF was asked for a comment, he rambled, "I was never a fan of U2"

[TomSlick]

2. Apropos to nothing but the story reminds me of a line from a comedy years ago.

I can't find it now but there was a sitcom decades ago in which the cast was visiting Joshua Tree National Park. A ranger was going on about the bees that pollinate the plants. At the end of his spiel, the ranger asked "Where would the Joshua Tree be without the Joshua Tree bees?"

[republianmushroom]

3. Thank you federal court for this action.

[slightlv]

4. I'm grateful for the ruling, but the reporter who made the headline

needs to go back to headline design school! How hard is it to write: Joshua Tree will retain protected status... instead of what this guy wrote... which is essentially a sentence of double negatives. I ended up reading it more than once before jumping to the story to find out how exactly they ruled.

[question everything]

5. K&R