Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(157,314 posts)
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 11:17 AM Jun 27

Supreme Court turns aside conservative challenge to $8 billion phone and internet subsidy program

Source: USA Today

June 27, 2025, 10:43 a.m. ET


WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on June 27 upheld an $8 billion federal program that subsidizes high-speed internet and phone service for millions of Americans, rejecting a conservative argument that the program is funded by an unconstitutional tax. The case raised questions about how much Congress can “delegate” its legislative authority to a federal agency and whether the Supreme Court should tighten that standard.

Under a law Congress passed in 1996, telecommunications companies are charged a Universal Service Fund fee – passed on to customers − that boosts phone and internet service to households and hospitals in rural areas, to low-income families, and to public schools and libraries. A private administrator overseen by the Federal Communications Commission distributes the funding, collects the fees and estimates how much needs to be raised each quarter. The FCC must approve the estimate before it’s used to determine fees for each carrier.

The conservative group Consumers’ Research, a carrier and a group of consumers challenged this setup, which has been the law for nearly three decades, asserting it’s Congress, not the FCC – and certainly not a private entity − that must determine the fee level. "At its heart, this case is about taxation without representation," Trent McCotter, an attorney for the group, told the Supreme Court in March. “The amount of public revenue to raise is a quintessential legislative determination, not some minor detail to be filled in later.”

While appeals courts in Ohio and Georgia rejected those arguments, the Louisiana-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declared the universal service fee unconstitutional.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/06/27/supreme-court-decision-universal-service-fund/83332336007/



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-354_0861.pdf

I was waiting for SOME news outlet to write this up because this impactful for many people (and the decision was the 2nd one released)! 5th Circuit is getting ass-kickage today.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court turns aside conservative challenge to $8 billion phone and internet subsidy program (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jun 27 OP
They gave us a crumb Miguelito Loveless Jun 27 #1
I breathe a sigh of relief. Undeserved and economically disadvantaged rural areas desperately need access to the Martin68 Jun 27 #2
News outlet... reACTIONary Jun 27 #3
Thanks but look what time they did it BumRushDaShow Jun 27 #4
The big news.... reACTIONary Jun 27 #5
But even with the CASA decision BumRushDaShow Jun 27 #6

Miguelito Loveless

(5,107 posts)
1. They gave us a crumb
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 11:50 AM
Jun 27

while they solidified the Orange Regimes power and prohibited lower courts from stopping them when the commit illegal and unconstitutional acts.

Martin68

(26,227 posts)
2. I breathe a sigh of relief. Undeserved and economically disadvantaged rural areas desperately need access to the
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 11:51 AM
Jun 27

internet. No one can function in today's world without access to the internet. It is as vital as electricity and running water.

reACTIONary

(6,602 posts)
3. News outlet...
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 12:55 PM
Jun 27

..... WaPo has a series of articles on the recent SCOTUS decisions. This decision has a write up.
https://wapo.st/3TepJ8X (No Paywall)

BumRushDaShow

(157,314 posts)
4. Thanks but look what time they did it
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 01:09 PM
Jun 27


The Court came into session ~10:05 am EDT and TRUMP v. CASA was the first out of the gate and an article was up by NBC News (while others were mulling about it in "Live Updates" versions) at ~10:13 am. I think the Kennedy v. Braidwood Management (HHS Taskforce for the ACA) may have been next (although there was a delay by news sites getting that one), then FCC v. Consumers' Research (the subsidies for internet), which seemed to get completely lost in a news cycle shuffle while the news orgs were still drowning themselves in the CASA case (and continue to do so right now).

reACTIONary

(6,602 posts)
5. The big news....
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 01:30 PM
Jun 27

.... is the 14th amendment / universal injunction decision. No news source is going to prioritize this over that. If there wasn't anything else on the docket, it probably would have gotten more, and more immediate, attention.

BumRushDaShow

(157,314 posts)
6. But even with the CASA decision
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 01:43 PM
Jun 27

it wasn't even dealing with the underlying 14th Amendment issue itself - just the imposition of "nationwide injunctions" to block E.O.s by 45 (and in this case, the one he had regarding the citizenship thing). And oddly enough, it was also the FIRST decision out vs being the last one and then they're done for the term like many of the previous SCOTUS "major" decisions.

And even then, leading up to that, the media mischaracterized what was being decided and the aftermath is not going to be what some might think.

The biggest user of "nationwide injunctions" has been the 5th Circuit Districts so we shall see what happens given how it's being spun at the moment. It is cutting off the nose to spite the face.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court turns aside...