Supreme Court turns aside conservative challenge to $8 billion phone and internet subsidy program
Source: USA Today
June 27, 2025, 10:43 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on June 27 upheld an $8 billion federal program that subsidizes high-speed internet and phone service for millions of Americans, rejecting a conservative argument that the program is funded by an unconstitutional tax. The case raised questions about how much Congress can delegate its legislative authority to a federal agency and whether the Supreme Court should tighten that standard.
Under a law Congress passed in 1996, telecommunications companies are charged a Universal Service Fund fee passed on to customers − that boosts phone and internet service to households and hospitals in rural areas, to low-income families, and to public schools and libraries. A private administrator overseen by the Federal Communications Commission distributes the funding, collects the fees and estimates how much needs to be raised each quarter. The FCC must approve the estimate before its used to determine fees for each carrier.
The conservative group Consumers Research, a carrier and a group of consumers challenged this setup, which has been the law for nearly three decades, asserting its Congress, not the FCC and certainly not a private entity − that must determine the fee level. "At its heart, this case is about taxation without representation," Trent McCotter, an attorney for the group, told the Supreme Court in March. The amount of public revenue to raise is a quintessential legislative determination, not some minor detail to be filled in later.
While appeals courts in Ohio and Georgia rejected those arguments, the Louisiana-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declared the universal service fee unconstitutional.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/06/27/supreme-court-decision-universal-service-fund/83332336007/
Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-354_0861.pdf
I was waiting for SOME news outlet to write this up because this impactful for many people (and the decision was the 2nd one released)! 5th Circuit is getting ass-kickage today.

Miguelito Loveless
(5,107 posts)while they solidified the Orange Regimes power and prohibited lower courts from stopping them when the commit illegal and unconstitutional acts.
Martin68
(26,227 posts)internet. No one can function in today's world without access to the internet. It is as vital as electricity and running water.
reACTIONary
(6,602 posts)..... WaPo has a series of articles on the recent SCOTUS decisions. This decision has a write up.
https://wapo.st/3TepJ8X (No Paywall)
BumRushDaShow
(157,314 posts)
The Court came into session ~10:05 am EDT and TRUMP v. CASA was the first out of the gate and an article was up by NBC News (while others were mulling about it in "Live Updates" versions) at ~10:13 am. I think the Kennedy v. Braidwood Management (HHS Taskforce for the ACA) may have been next (although there was a delay by news sites getting that one), then FCC v. Consumers' Research (the subsidies for internet), which seemed to get completely lost in a news cycle shuffle while the news orgs were still drowning themselves in the CASA case (and continue to do so right now).

reACTIONary
(6,602 posts).... is the 14th amendment / universal injunction decision. No news source is going to prioritize this over that. If there wasn't anything else on the docket, it probably would have gotten more, and more immediate, attention.
BumRushDaShow
(157,314 posts)it wasn't even dealing with the underlying 14th Amendment issue itself - just the imposition of "nationwide injunctions" to block E.O.s by 45 (and in this case, the one he had regarding the citizenship thing). And oddly enough, it was also the FIRST decision out vs being the last one and then they're done for the term like many of the previous SCOTUS "major" decisions.
And even then, leading up to that, the media mischaracterized what was being decided and the aftermath is not going to be what some might think.
The biggest user of "nationwide injunctions" has been the 5th Circuit Districts so we shall see what happens given how it's being spun at the moment. It is cutting off the nose to spite the face.