Trump asks for release of grand jury documents in Epstein case
Source: Reuters
July 18, 2025 4:57 AM EDT Updated 10 mins ago
WASHINGTON, July 17 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration will ask a court to allow the release of grand jury testimony in the case of deceased convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, after some of his supporters reacted in fury to a report concluding there was no evidence to support long-running theories about his case.
"Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
Shortly after Trump's statement, Bondi said on X that the Justice Department was ready to ask the court on Friday to unseal the grand jury transcripts.
"President Trump - we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts," Bondi wrote.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-asks-release-grand-jury-documents-epstein-case-2025-07-18/
Heard from a legal analyst on my CBS news radio affiliate this morning indicating that a judge would need to approve that and that might be doubtful.

yardwork
(67,249 posts)Irish_Dem
(72,467 posts)To say the whole thing is a hoax is a huge lie.
FakeNoose
(37,916 posts)What he meant to say was that HIS INVOLVEMENT with Epstein's shit is a huge lie.
But he's been lying for so many years about everything ... and besides, that he's no lawyer and he can't think like one. So the result is that it doesn't really matter what he says, because nobody believes him anyway.
He's been crying "Wolf!" ever since he got out of college and started working for his dad. I think that's what Roy Cohn taught him.
ancianita
(41,087 posts)and MAGA country will not fall for this.
live love laugh
(15,646 posts)gab13by13
(28,877 posts)it's a good thing for Krasnov that he just fired the lead prosecutor who could verify if it was accurate or know if it was incomplete.
live love laugh
(15,646 posts)
kacekwl
(8,473 posts)Pertinent ? 3 guesses.
republianmushroom
(20,690 posts)Evolve Dammit
(21,024 posts)republianmushroom
(20,690 posts)FBI agents were told to 'flag' any Epstein records that mentioned Trump, Sen. Durbin says
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143497979
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/18/trump-epstein-fbi-durbin.html
They will be whitewashing the orange stain.
Figarosmom
(7,002 posts)The lawyer on the case really is fishy.
ancianita
(41,087 posts)LudwigPastorius
(12,968 posts)The evidence would be centered on proving Epstein should be indicted, which doesn't necessarily reveal the names of the clients he "served".
During a grand jury, including the names and full details of every secondary figure might not be necessary to establish probable cause against the individual the prosecutor is seeking to indict.
twodogsbarking
(14,449 posts)
Karasu
(1,640 posts)Let me stop you there, Reuters.
Those "long-running theories" his supporters have are conspiracy theories. They are completely divorced from reality, based on the idea that Dems are a bunch of blood-drinking kiddy diddlers. You are legitimizing QAnon just as much as the GOP has over the last 10 years by describing them this way.
Stop. Normalizing. This. Shit.
OKIsItJustMe
(21,447 posts)By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER
Updated 5:35 PM EDT, July 18, 2025
WASHINGTON (AP) The Justice Department asked a federal court on Friday to unseal grand jury transcripts in Jeffrey Epsteins case amid a firestorm over the Trump administrations handling of records related to the wealthy financier.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche filed a motion urging the court to release the transcripts a day after President Donald Trump directed the Justice Department to do so.
The Trump administration has been embroiled in controversy since the Justice Department last week announced that it would not be releasing any more evidence in its possession from Epsteins investigation.
Trumps demand to release the grand jury transcripts came after The Wall Street Journal reported on a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Trumps name and was included in a 2003 album for Epsteins 50th birthday.
Evolve Dammit
(21,024 posts)Evolve Dammit
(21,024 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(166,465 posts)This is a stunt which would not include the vast majority of the file on Epstein. First, it is highly unlikely that the court will release these files given the appeal by Maxwell. The material in these transcripts are a very tiny part of the material in the FBI/DOJ possession.
This is a stunt to try to take pressure off trump.
Link to tweet
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/07/18/bondi-epstein-files-documents-grand-jury-testimony-doj/
A judge would have to agree to release them, a process that could take weeks or months. Even then, their disclosure is by no means certain. Grand jury records are shielded by secrecy rules to protect crime victims, witnesses and the accused, and are made public only under limited circumstances......
The sealed transcripts would constitute only a fraction of the evidence and investigative material that the FBI amassed during its years-long investigation. The transcripts are unlikely to fully satisfy Trumps right-wing base, which continues to call for full transparency surrounding the investigation.
It is generally a very, very small portion of any investigative file, said Christopher OLeary, who spent more than two decades as an FBI counterterrorism agent.
The full extent of what remains under wraps is unclear. Thousands of pages of documents related to the Epstein investigation have already been released through lawsuits, court filings, public records requests and the Justice Departments prosecution of Maxwell......
As recently as last year, the younger Comey had sought in court to keep records pertaining to some aspects of the Epstein investigation under wraps in a suit brought by the gossip website Radar Online seeking FBI records. Comey pushed against making those documents public in a January 2024 court filing, saying it could interfere with Maxwells ongoing appeal of her conviction and subject victims and witnesses to embarrassment and potential harassment.