Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(132,065 posts)
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 11:40 AM Sep 2025

Justice Amy Coney Barrett defends overturning Roe v. Wade and reveals Supreme Court dynamics in new book

Source: CNN

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in a new memoir defends her vote reversing a half century of national abortion rights, declaring that Roe v. Wade usurped the will of the American people and “came at a cost.”

“(T)he Court’s role is to respect the choices that the people have agreed upon, not to tell them what they should agree to,” Barrett writes in “Listening to the Law,” set to be published on September 9.

CNN obtained access to Barrett’s memoir, in which the justice also takes on religious bias and details her decision-making process, revealing that her chambers once celebrated with champagne when other justices joined a “particularly tricky” opinion of hers.

Barrett, President Donald Trump’s third appointee to the high court, has emerged as a crucial justice on the nine-member bench, shaping the contours of oral arguments and often providing a key vote for the decision in a case.

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/exclusive-justice-amy-coney-barrett-080005700.html



Roe v. Wade usurped the will of the American people? You need to step out of your bubble.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Amy Coney Barrett defends overturning Roe v. Wade and reveals Supreme Court dynamics in new book (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2025 OP
"The Court's role is to respect the choices that the people have agreed upon" Midnight Writer Sep 2025 #1
because she's an asshole who thinks religions should control people mdbl Sep 2025 #2
She lied. Dawson Leery Sep 2025 #3
She's a liar and she knows it. hamsterjill Sep 2025 #4
Typical Phony Religious Hypocrite 2na fisherman Sep 2025 #5
Like a lot of them she hides behind "The will of the people" jgmiller Sep 2025 #6
Fuck her. NewHendoLib Sep 2025 #7
Reserved for Leonard Leo. rubbersole Sep 2025 #19
K&R for your last statement mountain grammy Sep 2025 #8
Of course the Handmaiden would think that, she signed a contract to support her church & obviously that lark Sep 2025 #9
You know our countries laws basically are founded on separation of church and state. Yet bluestarone Sep 2025 #10
Upside down world view IbogaProject Sep 2025 #11
Because in order to have Freedom in a Free Society Mr.Bee Sep 2025 #12
Thanks a lot Jean Genie Sep 2025 #13
Shame on her!!! calimary Sep 2025 #14
Horrible woman. ananda Sep 2025 #15
The courts don't decide on the will of the people kkmarie Sep 2025 #16
Critical vote to go from 6-3 fascists to 5-4...not buying it JT45242 Sep 2025 #17
Thanks for posting this article, Yo. 70sEraVet Sep 2025 #18
Whoa, Whoa, Whoa RobinA Sep 2025 #20
roe didn't FORCE WOMEN TO ABORT. america is NOT CATHOLIC. pansypoo53219 Sep 2025 #21
Maybe I'm wrong here but does anyone else think it is inappropriate for any of these Marie Marie Sep 2025 #22

Midnight Writer

(25,110 posts)
1. "The Court's role is to respect the choices that the people have agreed upon"
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 11:45 AM
Sep 2025

Polls show Americans strongly support abortion rights. Why does she disrespect that choice?

She is writing about respecting people's choices while defending her ruling to deprive people of their choices.

That is some Grade A Bullshit right there.

Dawson Leery

(19,510 posts)
3. She lied.
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 11:56 AM
Sep 2025

She is the negative reflection of the cestpool school from Indiana.
And again, I will NEVER step into a Roman Church!

hamsterjill

(16,889 posts)
4. She's a liar and she knows it.
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 12:07 PM
Sep 2025

Writing a book must be some kind of confession?? I don't know.

All I know is that I won't be buying the book, or spend the time reading even a free copy. She's the stereotypical crazy Evangelical. She would be perfectly happy back in heels and pearls with twenty kids, cooking and cleaning all day.

Women like her need to get the fuck out of the way and let the strong ones take control.

2na fisherman

(208 posts)
5. Typical Phony Religious Hypocrite
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 12:16 PM
Sep 2025

How is she supporting all the unwanted neglected children? She should have many adopted children. Since she participated in the ban on abortions on moral grounds to protect the unborn, what happens to them after they are born seems to be of no concern to her. Forcing mothers to bear babies they cannot afford comes at a cost. And all her pandering to religion does not begin to pay it.

jgmiller

(665 posts)
6. Like a lot of them she hides behind "The will of the people"
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 12:21 PM
Sep 2025

Because she equates voting in Trump and/or the GOP to control congress as the will of the people. Which is true in a very limited, technical view. That lets her ignore polls that show 70% (or whatever the number is) of the people support something.

In other words it's not "the will of the people" she supports it's the "will of the winner"

mountain grammy

(28,575 posts)
8. K&R for your last statement
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 12:47 PM
Sep 2025

"Roe v. Wade usurped the will of the American people? You need to step out of your bubble."

lark

(25,823 posts)
9. Of course the Handmaiden would think that, she signed a contract to support her church & obviously that
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 01:17 PM
Sep 2025

means more to her than the law.

bluestarone

(21,006 posts)
10. You know our countries laws basically are founded on separation of church and state. Yet
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 01:28 PM
Sep 2025

We get super religious assholes that will NEVER vote anti their beliefs. (THIS is a big NO NO especially on the supreme court, because their vote is the FINAL VOTE!

IbogaProject

(5,524 posts)
11. Upside down world view
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 01:46 PM
Sep 2025

Restricting individual choice some how overturned an oppressive law? If you are opposed to abortion don't have any, and endeavor to reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies. But some pregnancies become life threatening and often when the fetus isn't viable.

Jean Genie

(532 posts)
13. Thanks a lot
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 02:07 PM
Sep 2025

Thanks for your "words of wisdumb," Hunny-Bunny Barret. Because YOU are the definitive word on women's rights, and whether women do or do not want those hard fought reproductive rights that you and the Old White (mostly) Boys' Club took from us. May your new book be a mega (maga) flop!

kkmarie

(336 posts)
16. The courts don't decide on the will of the people
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 02:15 PM
Sep 2025

They rule based on laws and the Constitution. RoevWade was decided based on the Constitution it was overturned based on the will of the alt-right. If the Supreme Court decided based on the will of the people the justices should then be elected officials not appointments.

What utter bullshit!

RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES NOW

#EpsteinFiles

JT45242

(3,794 posts)
17. Critical vote to go from 6-3 fascists to 5-4...not buying it
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 02:24 PM
Sep 2025

Seriously, when she makes the 5-4 vote that saves pick one...gay marriage, ending gerrymandered districts, gun control, protecting birth control, then I might believe it

70sEraVet

(5,202 posts)
18. Thanks for posting this article, Yo.
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 02:30 PM
Sep 2025

I've been trying to wrap my head around her vision of the role of the Supreme Court. Certainly, interpreting the Constitution as it applies to a modern society would require taking into consideration the views of the members society. But it's NOT based on a popularity contest! The Constitution does serve to protect the rights of minorities, regardless whether or not it is the 'popular' thing to do.

RobinA

(10,464 posts)
20. Whoa, Whoa, Whoa
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 03:18 PM
Sep 2025

When I was in school the role of the Supreme Court was to interpret the law. It had nothing to do with any "will of the people." If people vote by a landslide that it's OK to make a law that says you can execute someone for calling the President a moron, that doesn't give the Court the okey dokey to approve such a law. Their guidance is the Constitution, not public opinion. Every single Con Law teacher/professor I ever had made that point repeatedly.

Marie Marie

(10,824 posts)
22. Maybe I'm wrong here but does anyone else think it is inappropriate for any of these
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 03:51 PM
Sep 2025

"justices" to be writing books about the court and their recent decisions? Shouldn't they be focused on upholding the Constitution and not trying to justify.or explain their biased decisions. Just seems wrong to me somehow. Right or wrong - screw her and her religious beliefs/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justice Amy Coney Barrett...