Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(173,120 posts)
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:48 PM 11 hrs ago

Federal judge dismisses indictments against Letitia James and James Comey, saying Lindsey Halligan appointment was unlaw

Source: CNN

A federal judge dismissed the indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James on Monday.

The judge found that the appointment of interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan in Alexandria, Virginia, was invalid.

Trump handpicked Halligan for the role amid increasing pressure to bring criminal cases against his political enemies, including Comey and James.

“The Attorney General’s attempt to install Ms. Halligan as Interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid,” Judge Cameron McGowan Currie wrote in her Monday order.

According to Currie, “all actions flowing from Ms. Halligan’s defective appointment” including the indictments against Comey and James “were unlawful exercises of executive power and are hereby set aside.”

The judge tossed out the cases “without prejudice,” leaving open the possibility that the cases against Comey and James can be brought again alleging the same conduct.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/24/politics/james-comey-letitia-james-indictments-dismissed?cid=ios_app



I just posted the updated CNN article
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge dismisses indictments against Letitia James and James Comey, saying Lindsey Halligan appointment was unlaw (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago OP
LOL! JoseBalow 11 hrs ago #1
Beat me by 2 minutes! BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #2
You usually beat me LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago #4
I get billions of "breaking news" banners all day and night from the news apps BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #11
I really appreciate your daily news posts thought crime 11 hrs ago #5
Thanks! They promised to "flood the zone" and they have! BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #12
Comey case dismissed without prejudice. Halligan invalidly appointed, judge rules LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago #3
The most incompetent administration ever. Nittersing 11 hrs ago #7
They should have dismissed "with prejudice" BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #13
I know. I'm definitely not happy with the without prejudice part. ananda 10 hrs ago #19
Well I'm guessing because of the novel and convoluted way BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #29
They are not operating as upholders of the law or Constitution... ananda 8 hrs ago #30
Pound sand, Bondi! It's always loyalty over competence when dealing with the toddler-in-chief surfered 11 hrs ago #6
Judge dismisses cases against James Comey and Letitia James after finding prosecutor was unlawfully appointed LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago #8
This message was self-deleted by its author ificandream 11 hrs ago #9
Woo hoo! mcar 11 hrs ago #10
Appeal in 10, 9, 8 .... sinkingfeeling 11 hrs ago #14
What's to appeal? The prosecutors messed up, they can't appeal this ruling FakeNoose 11 hrs ago #17
DOJ has to appeal. Du916 10 hrs ago #22
Love your "you can beat a dead horse" analogy..... ProudMNDemocrat 9 hrs ago #25
Link to orders (PDFs) BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #15
DOJ bromeando 11 hrs ago #16
LOL@MAGA RedWhiteBlueIsRacist 11 hrs ago #18
"without prejudice" Of, fer chris' sake! Grins 10 hrs ago #20
Veryn Happy here. So is it possible for Letitia to proceed against TSF? bluestarone 10 hrs ago #21
Judge Currie basically slams the door on re-indicting Comey here. LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #23
Great News... TY LMPV! Cha 9 hrs ago #24
Only way Comey gets charged is if this ruling is overturned IbogaProject 9 hrs ago #26
"Without prejudice" LiberalLovinLug 9 hrs ago #27
Did trump choose her for her looks Coldwater 8 hrs ago #28

BumRushDaShow

(163,781 posts)
11. I get billions of "breaking news" banners all day and night from the news apps
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:09 PM
11 hrs ago

(on my iphone, iPad, and now Apple Watch )

CNN still hasn't sent a breaking through their app on this yet (they did the Mark Kelly one though).

LetMyPeopleVote

(173,120 posts)
3. Comey case dismissed without prejudice. Halligan invalidly appointed, judge rules
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:54 PM
11 hrs ago

BREAKING: Comey case dismissed without prejudice. Halligan invalidly appointed, judge rules. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney.bsky.social) 2025-11-24T17:36:58.237Z

ananda

(34,077 posts)
19. I know. I'm definitely not happy with the without prejudice part.
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:45 PM
10 hrs ago

I mean, it looks quite obviously prejudicial to me.

BumRushDaShow

(163,781 posts)
29. Well I'm guessing because of the novel and convoluted way
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 03:54 PM
8 hrs ago

the 45 admin has been handling these U.S. Attorney appointments and there really hasn't been any SCOTUS precedent ruling for what should be considered a clearly illegal circumstance.

Hell - they have been trying to disqualify Jack Smith (not understanding the difference between "principal officers" and "inferior officers", where Garland appointed Smith as an "inferior officer", in contrast to what they have been doing - appointing new "Actings" when the temp's appointee's detail expires (in some cases, appointing someone who didn't even work in the office), and then lofting them into all the duties of a "principal" officer-equivalent of a U.S. Attorney. And worse, Bondi apparently "retroactively-approved" this mess and called it "done".

ananda

(34,077 posts)
30. They are not operating as upholders of the law or Constitution...
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 04:21 PM
8 hrs ago

but rather whims of iron.

surfered

(10,471 posts)
6. Pound sand, Bondi! It's always loyalty over competence when dealing with the toddler-in-chief
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:59 PM
11 hrs ago

LetMyPeopleVote

(173,120 posts)
8. Judge dismisses cases against James Comey and Letitia James after finding prosecutor was unlawfully appointed
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:02 PM
11 hrs ago

This makes me smile

BREAKING: Judge dismisses cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after finding prosecutor was unlawfully appointed.

NBC News (@nbcnews.com) 2025-11-24T17:49:03Z

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/judge-dismisses-cases-james-comey-letitia-james-finding-prosecutor-was-rcna244775

A federal judge dismissed the criminal indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after finding the prosecutor who brought the cases was not lawfully appointed.

"I agree with Mr. Comey that the Attorney General’s attempt to install Ms. Halligan as Interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid. And because Ms. Halligan had no lawful authority to present the indictment, I will grant Mr. Comey’s motion and dismiss the indictment," U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie wrote in her ruling, finding the indictment should be tossed because the appointment of former Donald Trump personal lawyer Lindsey Halligan was invalid and she'd lacked the authority to present a case to a grand jury.

She issued a separate ruling dismissing the James case.

Because Halligan, who'd been appointed interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia at Trump's direction, was the only prosecutor to present the cases and sign the indictments, the indictments should be voided, the judge found.

The ruling could have major ramifications for other prosecutions brought by Halligan’s office during her tenure. A similar ruling disqualifying Alina Habba as the New Jersey U.S. Attorney has resulted in a number of criminal cases brought under her leadership being stuck in legal limbo while she appeals the decision.

Currie seemed largely skeptical of the Justice Department's position at a rare joint hearing on the issue with lawyers for Comey and James on Nov. 13, where a prosecutor portrayed questions about Halligan's appointment as "a paperwork error."

Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Original post)

FakeNoose

(39,628 posts)
17. What's to appeal? The prosecutors messed up, they can't appeal this ruling
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:42 PM
11 hrs ago

If they decide on a REDO ... they'll have to start all over with a new Grand Jury and get a new indictment.
Are they really going to do that again? Comey's lawyers have already seen how lame their "evidence" is.




Du916

(136 posts)
22. DOJ has to appeal.
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:31 PM
10 hrs ago

Re-indictment is not possible because the statute of limitations has run. An appeal is low probability.

ProudMNDemocrat

(20,418 posts)
25. Love your "you can beat a dead horse" analogy.....
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 03:24 PM
9 hrs ago

Because even with a refiling, the case dismissal rings even louder.

This does not endear a "vote off confidence" on Pammy B's part. It does illustrate just how INCOMPETENT she is at her job and exposes her motives as purely "Political payback".

Grins

(9,127 posts)
20. "without prejudice" Of, fer chris' sake!
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:55 PM
10 hrs ago

If there ever was a case FOR prejudice it was these two.

LetMyPeopleVote

(173,120 posts)
23. Judge Currie basically slams the door on re-indicting Comey here.
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:39 PM
10 hrs ago

The statute of limitations has run.




Comey will still have to respond the upcoming appeal but he should get a final judgement at some point

IbogaProject

(5,459 posts)
26. Only way Comey gets charged is if this ruling is overturned
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 03:28 PM
9 hrs ago

The Statue of Limitations ran out the day after that "inditement", so the only way the Fed Government can charge is if this rulling is overtunred, and then his other appeals come into play. In a way if Tangerine pushes them to try and appeal it will leave Halligan in a risky position as her specific actions submitted two inditements and questions if the second grand jury vote was based on the document filed. I think she commited actual fraud, I hope if that happened she ends up in Prison in 28 or 29.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,541 posts)
27. "Without prejudice"
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 03:31 PM
9 hrs ago

It should have been With prejudice. James is not in the clear. They can keep harassing her with new threats now.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge dismisses i...