"Needs to get the hell out": House Dems fume at Schumer
Source: Axios
House Democrats found themselves in the familiar position this week of seething at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) for negotiating a deal with Republicans to keep the government funded.
While his caucus remains behind him, Schumer is becoming persona non grata for much of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. "I'm gonna continue to tell you that Schumer needs to get the hell out over and over and over until he does," Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) told Axios. "He continues to demonstrate to us that he can't meet the moment," she added.Another House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to offer insights into private conversations among lawmakers, told Axios: "The main feeling among members is a lack of trust in his strength and ability to strike a hard bargain."
The House voted Tuesday to pass an appropriations package that funds the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Labor, Housing and Urban Development, State and Transportation until September. It also keeps the Department of Homeland Security funded at 2025 levels until Feb. 13, which is meant to give Senate Democrats and the White House enough time to hash out a final deal on ICE and Customs and Border Protection reforms. But while Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) have said they won't accept anything short of reforms of those agencies, their GOP counterparts have cast doubt on the prospect of a quick deal. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) went so far as to tell reporters that a deal by Feb. 13 was an "impossibility," floating a year-long stopgap funding bill to keep DHS open.
What they're saying: Jeffries has essentially threatened to allow a DHS shutdown if his demands aren't met, saying in a statement Tuesday, "Absent bold and meaningful change, there is no credible path forward with respect to the Department of Homeland Security funding bill next week." But Schumer, asked if he would make the same ultimatum at a press conference with Jeffries on Wednesday, told reporters, "I'm just going to say we're sending them a proposal and we await their response." Senate Democrats unlike their House counterparts have the ability to block a DHS funding bill because it takes a 60-vote majority to pass it in the upper chamber. Some Democrats, worried that the threat of a DHS shutdown is not enough to force Republicans to the table, feel Schumer gave up the party's best leverage by cutting a deal to reopen the rest of the government. "Every time that we are winning, we seem to somehow sabotage [it]," Ramirez fumed, noting that House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has already ruled out several Democratic demands.
Read more: https://www.axios.com/2026/02/05/democrats-schumer-ice-government-shutdown?utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_source=x
3Hotdogs
(15,142 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(22,596 posts)GB_RN
(3,531 posts)That the commenter is saying they wish to see Chucky primaried by AOC. Polls Ive seen for a theoretical matchup of the two, show Chucky decisively losing to her. Losing by about 20 points.
orangecrush
(29,315 posts)PatrickforB
(15,381 posts)from Middle Class kitchen tables everywhere that WE THE PEOPLE need OUR GOVERNMENT that WE PAY FOR WITH OUR TAXES to do stuff that actually benefits us.
Because the big money donors to BOTH PARTIES are Wall Steet establishment types or libertarian billionaire parasites who don't give one single shit about things like HEALTH CARE DEBT, SOCIAL SECURITY, CHILDCARE AND FREE PUBLIC EDUCATION.
I'm tired of the institionalists. The sooner Schumer is OUT the better it will be for every single member of the American middle class that has to juggle every fucking month to make ends meet. I'm sick of a fucking nonresponsive government that does not use my tax dollars to help me at the kitchen table.
GiqueCee
(3,615 posts)... is one of the smartest people in politics right now. I can see no worthwhile purpose in wishing her to be primaried. I, for one, would be happy to call her Madam President some day, if I live that long.
BaronChocula
(4,170 posts)I believe that was the reference.
GiqueCee
(3,615 posts)... is an idea I can get behind! I wasn't aware that she was considering such action; that intent didn't seem clear in the original post. Thanks for the clarification.
ECL213
(436 posts)Seinan Sensei
(1,437 posts)grew up working in his familys bar
Emile
(41,367 posts)MadameButterfly
(3,864 posts)AOC primarying Schumer. I don't think anyone here is suggesting a primary of AOC's house seat.
BlueKota
(5,132 posts)she's got my vote.
NewHendoLib
(61,696 posts)of the moment. Way too many politicians stay around way too long.
bluestarone
(21,626 posts)These GOONS have ZERO thought of playing old school. THEY have ZERO feelings for humanity. ZERO!!
LiberalArkie
(19,471 posts)I do not think Schumer has ever met a Republican he did not like and trust. At least he acts like it.
bluestarone
(21,626 posts)His Hearts in the right place. BUT with these GOONS we need different more that that heart feeling, Sorry to say.
DemocracyForever
(50 posts)is what's brought our country to the verge of becoming a Nazi dictatorship. This go along to get along, let's be nice crowd needs to be replaced with leaders who understand the gravity of the situation that our country is now in and are willing to make a stand to save our country. American democracy's very survival is at stake. The "nice" crowd seems to be oblivious to this ugly truth.
BattleRow
(2,141 posts)Goes nowhere and gets nothing.
OldBaldy1701E
(10,629 posts)One would have hoped that after several decades of being bitten on the ass with this practice...
DemocracyForever
(50 posts)FakeNoose
(40,675 posts)But it's not 1990, and Bob Dole and Howard Baker are long gone. We're at the end of our rope and Chuck Schumer can't do anything but play nice. I'm sure the Repukes are taking advantage of that. There's no time for this anymore.
orangecrush
(29,315 posts)With Good and Pretti.
MadameButterfly
(3,864 posts)This is a cult with. a malignant narcissits in the lead. They are menatally ill and cannot be reasonable, even in their own best interests.
La Urraca
(15 posts)Schumer has made it VERY VERY clear that he is all about supporting and funding Israel.
ShazzieB
(22,333 posts)It's baffling that he doesn't. Completely baffling.
Please retire, Chuck, and clear the way for someone who knows the score.
BlueKota
(5,132 posts)I am an older American too, and I believe a lot of elder states-people still have a lot to offer, but not the ones who insist on living in the past. I see Senator Schumer as still entrenched in the quaint notion that his colleagues with an R behind their names are still basically "good-hearted" people, who while misguided, can be made to see reason.
He's dreaming. The majority of Rs are either cowards or greedy, power-hungry scum, who will do anything their dear leader commands them to, no matter who gets hurt in the process. They sold their souls to tsf in 2016, and have most don't working conscience anymore.
Most of them would sell their own families out. Anyone who doesn't get that, imho, isn't dealing with reality, and is waving the white flag without even pretending to stand up for the people who voted for them to do so.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,532 posts)and people get mad at me for "attacking" Democrats. I am not being "realistic" about the politics in DC.
Phoenix61
(18,765 posts)Scubamatt
(271 posts)Questioning established leadership in favor of more outspoken and vocal leaders like AOC or Jasmine Crocket can soemtimes be marginalized on this Board.
Prairie Gates
(7,534 posts)The truth is that he usually strikes exactly the bargain that he wants.
Do with that what you will.
LuvLoogie
(8,634 posts)Starts with a "C" and ends with an "omplicit."
orangecrush
(29,315 posts)BidenRocks
(2,936 posts)They are full UFC.
Please explain this concept to our elder statesmen!
littlemissmartypants
(32,776 posts)angrychair
(11,888 posts)Democrats are on the precipice of a very good day in the next election cycle. A very good day.
That said, if Democrats in Congress cave to Republicans or fail to at least seem to hold ice accountable for everything and demand systemic changes, it will significantly harm voter participation.
I say that after listening to a video of a professional wrestling match in Las Vegas last night in which the crowd, the entire crowd, was chanting "fuck ice" over and over again. Professional wrestling is typically very pro Republican. Has been for decades.
The sentiment is there to hold ice accountable. It only takes the backbone to make it happen.
BattleRow
(2,141 posts)littlemissmartypants
(32,776 posts)A bad reputation with the yout [sic] everywhere regardless.
It's very frustrating & fucking embarrassing.
Thank you for the discussion, Mr. Sparkle.
❤️🤍💙
🗳❌️👑
GB_RN
(3,531 posts)Chucky is playing by rules that were thrown out the window by the Groping Old Perverts and Newt Gingrich used his Contract ON (not with) America to win a House majority.
Basically, Chucky brings a butter knife to a gun fight.
durablend
(8,994 posts)AverageOldGuy
(3,546 posts)AOC
Take no prisoners.
That is all.
orangecrush
(29,315 posts)dem4decades
(13,852 posts)Someone inspirational, Someone that recognizes that the Republicans are willing to flush the entire Constitution down the toilet for power. They don't deserve the deference Schumer allows them.
tonekat
(2,481 posts)I've had a feeling that the GOP would try to actually outlaw the Democratic party.
I feel we're getting pretty close to that, and Schumer hasn't a clue.
hadEnuf
(3,564 posts)We were complaining about this before Pelosi finally had enough and got ugly with them. Even during Obama we were all complaining that he was trying to work with the right too much. I think he's learned since then though.
There is no compromise with the right. These people are bottom of the barrel neo-Nazis and white supremacists, while the rest of the so-called "normal" Republicans play see, hear and speak no evil. And I actually don't even think those ones really care how they get what they want as long as they get it.
democrank
(12,378 posts)should be enough to convince Democrats that we need to be tougher. A lot tougher. Given all the present circumstances, we should be fighting back ferociously like our lives depend on it. We hear it over and over and over ..Democrats are weak. Time to disprove that criticism.
Snackshack
(2,576 posts)No need for an opposition party when they have ppl like lieberman, fetterman, sinema, manchin and many others in the past to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory...
bob4460
(386 posts)We HAVE to have new progressive leadership!
Martin Eden
(15,438 posts)On that I would base my judgement on whether or not he's capable of driving a hard bargain.
Intractable
(1,747 posts)Too bad for the alerter.
Schumer is the one not supporting Democrats -- that is, me.
orangecrush
(29,315 posts)Posted a thread claiming that if we aren't satisfied we are saying we aren't going to vote.
It was a great thread, like flypaper.
I won't be hearing from a long list of anti progressives.
Thanks to them for drawing them out.
quakerboy
(14,780 posts)And is still pissed he gave us up in the end ofvthe first shutdown..
Can someone please explain to me why funding depts of housing, transportation, health, etc but not dhs is a bad thing?
Isn't that a selective shutdown of one ofvthe most corrupt departments without harming all the good workers of our government, or the people who need government to function for their continued safety and livelyhood?
In my book.. a dhs shutdown while the rest of government keeps going seems preferable to a full shutdown or the kind of weak deal that chuck normally takes
It seems like the only downside is ice is pre-funded for a good while. What am i missing?
republianmushroom
(22,136 posts)dugog55
(371 posts)All of these old time Democrats still think they can work with Republicans. That time is long gone. Obama tried it and got screwed repeatedly by McConnell. Biden still though he could work with the GOP, you just can't. They are too far gone. Everyone thinks that the Dems are going to far left. They are no further left than they were 60 years ago. They still want pretty much the same things for workers, the economy and the environment. The GOP however, has jumped of the radical right cliff and are light years away from the 50' and 60's when there was only minor differences in the two parties.
David Hogg was correct. We have to clean house and get rid of all the old dead wood in Congress. Kamala lost because she did not have the young peoples votes. The the two youngest generations that can vote want progressive policies and they just see Democrats as the other side of the same coin with the GOP. And for the most part they are correct. The Dems supported Israel's genocide on the Palestinians, the are beholding to corporate donors, and they are not protecting are natural environment from destruction by big corporations. They need to change and make it a big change. AOC and Sanders should be the norm, not outliers. This country will be better for it.
Abstractartist
(430 posts)Schumer is horrendous. When the democrats take control of the house and senate, they need to boot Schumer from the leader spot. Bring in new, younger blood or stay in second place.
bdamomma
(69,333 posts)the House Speaker Mike Johnson needs to be shown the door too. Get him out!!!!!
Exp
(817 posts)LymphocyteLover
(9,547 posts)And it brings out all the usual suspects who think Dems are complicit?
GTFOH.
Autumn
(48,863 posts)And they are not fucking happy with it. I agree with what Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) told Axios.
"He continues to demonstrate to us that he can't meet the moment,"
I'm sure she knows what she's talking about. Since she's there.
Autumn
(48,863 posts)At least I know she won't give Schumer's "friends on the other side of the aisle" everything they want.