US agency investigating if ABC's 'The View' violated equal time rules for political candidates
Source: msn/Reuters
12h
WASHINGTON, Feb 7 (Reuters) - The Federal Communications Commission is opening an investigation into whether ABC's "The View" daytime talk show violated equal time rules for interviews with political candidates after an appearance by a Democratic Texas Senate candidate this week, a source told Reuters on Saturday.
The Republican-led FCC said last month that daytime and late-night TV talk shows are no longer considered "bona fide" news programs that are exempt from equal time rules that require them to give airtime to the views of opposing candidates. In September, FCC Chair Brendan Carr said the agency should consider reviewing whether "The View" runs afoul of equal time rules.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly pushed Carr to take action against U.S. broadcasters and criticized networks for what he views as one-sided coverage. The move is the first significant step by the FCC to go after networks for interviews with political candidates.
TALK SHOWS WERE PREVIOUSLY EXEMPT
Until January, talk shows have qualified for the equal opportunities exemption as genuine news interviews, ever since the FCC Media Bureau granted an exemption to the interview portion of Jay Lenos "The Tonight Show" in 2006. Networks have relied on the ruling as a precedent for recent interviews with political candidates.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-agency-investigating-if-abcs-the-view-violated-equal-time-rules-for-political-candidates/ar-AA1VTizr
Roy Rolling
(7,524 posts)Republicans wanted equal time rules like the Fairness Doctrine abolished so their Fox News propaganda dreams could come true.
The FCC cant abolish what they already gutted.
Its like trying to cut the holes out of a blanket.
But 20% of MAGAts will go along with anything. Some bought Melania tickets, didnt they?
onenote
(46,066 posts)47 USC Section 315.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/315
While Carr's re-interpretation of the statute is bullshit, the equal opportunities rule (commonly referred to as the "equal time" rule), you are mistaken in thinking that the rule was repealed.
You should amend your post as it is incorrect.
JohnnyRingo
(20,642 posts)It's a negative image of The View where there are four republicans and one democrat.
PatSeg
(52,579 posts)As long as the "4" are republicans.
Baitball Blogger
(51,899 posts)channels. Because, from what I remember Ronald Reagan put an end to the Fairness Doctrine. And as for campaign laws, please. FoxNews is an operating campaign program for the Right.
onenote
(46,066 posts)Yes, the Fairness Doctrine rule, which was a non-statutory policy adopted by the FCC, was repealed in 1987. But the Equal Opportunities rule, which is statutory -- and has its origins in the Radio Act of 1927 -- was not impacted by the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine.
oldmanlynn
(795 posts)Doesnt seem to have much bite to it because nobody pays attention to that after they canceled and got rid of the fairness doctrine. Im just curious why would they need the fairness doctrine if they had the equal time law you referred to
onenote
(46,066 posts)The Equal Opportunities rule applies only to appearances by legally qualified candidates for office during a campaign and is intended to prevent broadcast licensees from providing valuable airtime to only one candidate. A related statutory rule -- the Lowest Unit Rate rule -- requires station licensees to make advertising time available to candidates at the lowest rate offered to anyone else.
The Fairness Doctrine was intended to ensure that at all times, not just during political campaigns, broadcasters covered controversial topics of public concern and allowed for competing viewpoints to be heard.
onenote
(46,066 posts)mdbl
(8,287 posts)Fux and Dorks is only on cable so the FCC rules don't apply. That being said, entertainment shows were never included, but the Dump administration makes up their own rules to enforce.
JohnnyRingo
(20,642 posts)It doesn't appeal to my sense of fairness, but it makes sense.
onenote
(46,066 posts)For example, Richard Nixon's 1968 "sock it to me" appearance on Laugh In triggered the rule, but Humphrey and Wallace declined the offer of equal time. And Kamala Harris's appearance on SNL triggered the rule because it wasn't a bona fide news interview.
The problem with the FCC's new interpretation is that it limits the bona fide interview exception to new programming; but there is a separate exception for news programming, so the new interpretation essentially negates the stand alone exception for interviews.
twodogsbarking
(17,962 posts)onenote
(46,066 posts)The rule has its origins in the original Radio Act of 1927.
twodogsbarking
(17,962 posts)Smackdown2019
(1,344 posts)They must of mistyped the network .. did they mean Foxnews????
Besides, freedom of the press....
