Hegseth Cites Falsehood to Defend His Firing of Senior Officers
Source: New York Times
Hegseth Cites Falsehood to Defend His Firing of Senior Officers
The defense secretary said at a House hearing that President Barack Obama had fired 197 generals, a figure that the Pentagon previously acknowledged was false.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseths actions to fire senior military leaders are without precedent in recent decades and have come with little explanation. Kenny Holston/The New York Times
By Greg Jaffe
Reporting from Washington
April 29, 2026
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday defended his decisions to fire or sideline nearly 30 generals and admirals over the past year with little explanation by falsely comparing his record to that of President Barack Obama.
I would also note that under Barack Obama, 197 general officers were removed, Mr. Hegseth said in testimony before the House Armed Services Committee. So this is not something specific to this administration.
The number Mr. Hegseth gave has no basis in fact. It originated with an unsigned 2018 editorial in Investors Business Daily, which cites the right-wing news site Breitbart.coms Facebook page as its source.
Mr. Hegseths actions to fire senior military leaders are without precedent in recent decades and have come with little explanation. On Wednesday, lawmakers pressed him to justify his decisions, including his move this month to remove Gen. Randy A. George, the Army chief of staff.
{snip}
Greg Jaffe covers the Pentagon and the U.S. military for The Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/by/greg-jaffe
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/29/us/politics/pete-hegseth-falsehood-firings.html
******
Kevin M. Kruse
@kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Drunky McFash got the facts wrong? What?!
Max Boot
@maxboot.bsky.social
· 8h
I would also note that under Barack Obama, 197 general officers were removed, Mr. Hegseth said in testimony before the House Armed Services Committee. So this is not something specific to this administration.
The number Mr. Hegseth gave has no basis in fact.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/29/us/politics/pete-hegseth-falsehood-firings.html
Hegseth Cites Falsehood to Defend His Firing of Senior Officers
www.nytimes.com
8:47 PM · Apr 29, 2026
******
Drunky McFash got the facts wrong? What?!
— Kevin M. Kruse (@kevinmkruse.bsky.social) 2026-04-30T00:47:43.767Z
******
Max Boot
@maxboot.bsky.social
I would also note that under Barack Obama, 197 general officers were removed, Mr. Hegseth said in testimony before the House Armed Services Committee. So this is not something specific to this administration.
The number Mr. Hegseth gave has no basis in fact.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/29/us/politics/pete-hegseth-falsehood-firings.html
Hegseth Cites Falsehood to Defend His Firing of Senior Officers
www.nytimes.com
8:47 PM · Apr 29, 2026
******
âI would also note that under Barack Obama, 197 general officers were removed,â Mr. Hegseth said in testimony before the House Armed Services Committee. âSo this is not something specific to this administration.â
— Max Boot (@maxboot.bsky.social) 2026-04-30T00:47:10.770Z
The number Mr. Hegseth gave has no basis in fact.
www.nytimes.com/2026/04/29/u...
Skittles
(172,537 posts)THIS stupid fucking asshole should not even be in charge of a fucking Dairy Queen.
mahatmakanejeeves
(70,502 posts)@ner430.bsky.social
Gift link
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/29/us/politics/pete-hegseth-falsehood-firings.html?unlocked_article_code=1.e1A.x0Qu.WXuwd7H8Ybvk&smid=url-share
Hegseth Cites Falsehood to Defend His Firing of Senior Officers
www.nytimes.com
11:31 PM · Apr 29, 2026
Gift link
— NER430 (@ner430.bsky.social) 2026-04-30T03:31:48.388Z
www.nytimes.com/2026/04/29/u...
TheRickles
(3,483 posts)I'll pass, but would someone please read it to see how many generals did Obama actually fire?
FormerOstrich
(2,892 posts)Please post if you are able to learn the actual number. As another poster surmised it may well be zero. I am curious the actual count.
Maybe the more relevant number is how many unqualified Hedge groupies will need to be removed when we MASA (Make America Sane Again).
BeneteauBum
(702 posts)should have all pertinent data in hand. When the SOW utters these lies, he should be countered with You lie before your God!.
Peace ☮️
KS Toronado
(23,779 posts)Betting 0 is the number or close to it.
Midnight Writer
(25,661 posts)The faithful will eat it up, just like all the other lies.
PatSeg
(53,378 posts)Just throw that mistruth out there and it will get repeated and accepted by much of the base.
Biophilic
(6,636 posts)They did it first so its ok for them to do it, without ever an explanation. Because there isnt a reasonable explanation. Bunch of idiots.
orangecrush
(30,884 posts)Is a "falsehood" a chickenshit way of saying lie?
Multichromatic
(195 posts)mackdaddy
(1,988 posts)I am shocked.
Well not that shocked.
Baitball Blogger
(52,637 posts)TheRickles
(3,483 posts)McChrystal, Petraeus, Mattis and Flynn, for starters. So it was yet another lie by Hegseth.
purr-rat beauty
(1,380 posts)For what the DOJ wants to reinstate
worthless, destructive, ignorant, deceitful, arrogant, traitorous POS
Mysterian
(6,597 posts)Right?
republianmushroom
(22,569 posts)difference between retiring and firing.
Adeptus2272
(9 posts)
SergeStorms
(20,759 posts)as a factual source, who can you trust?
LetMyPeopleVote
(181,437 posts)The secretary didnt just make a bogus claim about the Obama era, he also twice asserted very specific nonsense about the Biden era.
Pressed on whether heâd deploy troops to local voting precincts, Hegseth deflected and pushed a false claim â while under oath â about the Biden era.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-05-05T14:19:40.302Z
A week later, maybe he could give us a straight answer about the underlying question?
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/in-sworn-testimony-hegseth-pushed-false-claim-about-troops-deployed-to-voting-precincts
I will note that in 2024, troops were that was Joe Biden, by the way, Joe Biden were deployed to polling locations in 15 states, Hegseth said in sworn testimony to the House Armed Services Committee. For good measure, he repeated, 2024 Joe Biden troops deployed to polling locations in 15 states. Explain that one to me.
A day later, the secretary made the same claim in nearly identical wording during sworn testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Readers can probably guess where this is headed. CNN reported:
All of the National Guard activations connected to the 2024 election were ordered by state governors, not by Biden. And all 12 of the states that responded to CNNs requests for information said that none of their troops were deployed to polling locations.
Rather, the states said their Guard personnel worked behind the scenes at other locations helping with election cybersecurity or serving as internal liaisons or that their state Guard was not actually activated for the election after all.
Put another way, Hegseth didnt merely push a false claim about the Obama era, he also twice pushed a very specific false claim about the Biden era about which he got literally every detail wrong.
I will leave it to legal experts to assess whether the secretary crossed any lines by saying untrue things to Congress while under oath, but at this point, there are two questions the secretary and the Pentagon really ought to answer: 1) How and why did Hegseth prepare bogus talking points for sworn congressional testimony; and 2) Can Hegseth maybe now answer truthfully and specifically about his possible plans for the 2026 midterm elections?
republianmushroom
(22,569 posts)to try and cover his ass.
