Chief Justice John Roberts says Supreme Court is not political
Source: AP
Updated 10:24 PM EDT, May 6, 2026
HERSHEY, Pa. (AP) Supreme Court justices are not political actors, Chief Justice John Roberts said Wednesday, insisting unpopular court decisions are based solely on the law. I think, at a very basic level, people think were making policy decisions, were saying we think this is how things should be, as opposed to what the law provides, he said. I think they view us as purely political actors, which I dont think is an accurate understanding of what we do.
His remarks to a conference of judges and lawyers from the 3rd U.S. Circuit in Pennsylvania came at a time of low public confidence in the court, and about a week after the court handed down a decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act.
The high court struck down a majority-Black congressional district in Louisiana, finding it was an unconstitutional gerrymander based on race. The decision weakened the Civil Rights era law that has increased minority representation in Congress, and it opened the door for more redistricting across the country that could aid Republican efforts to control the House.
In recent years, the conservative majority court has also handed down landmark rulings overturning the constitutional right to abortion, expanding gun rights and ending affirmative action in higher education.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-chief-justice-8933cfe269c90746e200f2588801dfae
Utter BULLSHIT. YOU 6 are completely and unequivocally a bunch of rabid foaming-at-the-mouth soulless RW lunatics.
Like this?


wolfie001
(7,912 posts)That's the true definition of the "Shit 6". Of course, they're also anti-gay and anti-trans and anti-worker and anti-environment too. Quite a long list of items these 6 freaks are working on for the hateful and greedy billionaire fuckers.
Walleye
(45,303 posts)We think you are sucking up to maga and doing whatever Trump wants. Dont give yourself credit for anything.
GCG
(108 posts)Granting the president immunity of any kind is a fucking policy decision...because he made it up!!!
Roberts doesn't have a direct connection to a sugar daddy like Clarence does...but he does have a wife who has!!!
Chasstev365
(8,053 posts)Ponietz
(4,391 posts)Thats the same thing as saying the sky is green. Hes just gaslighting us, now.
Americanme
(535 posts)They are saying a rich man's right to free speech is a billion times greater than mine.
Ponietz
(4,391 posts)So the DOW roars and human beings are shit out of luck.
Whip-poor-will
(447 posts)They don't have to do jury duty or face a draft....nice gig if you can get it
Blues Heron
(8,984 posts)Goonch
(5,493 posts)
OldBaldy1701E
(11,447 posts)Well, tough noogies, Johnny-Boy... we don't care what you think. The reality is your actions are most certainly partisan and are not solely 'by the law'.
So, 'can' that shit, okay?
Javaman
(65,966 posts)fuck this disingenuous dick head
The Wizard
(13,831 posts)lock stock and barrel by the bribing class. Time to remove all vestiges masking the radical proclivities of the compromised Mediocre (formerly Supreme) Court. The Court has never stooped this low in all its history. Historically, minority rule ends badly. Ask Saddam Hussein .
Botany
(77,746 posts)bush v Gore, Citizens United, and ruling that Trump was allowed to break the law because he was
President were all just as bad.
This is the Court that that Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society wanted.
lastlib
(28,524 posts)in order to crush more worker unions, establish injustice, insure domestic serfdom, provide for our common protection, demote general welfare, and secure the blessings of money and power to ourselves and our progeny, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
We might as well make it honest and clear.......
Dustlawyer
(10,540 posts)Baitball Blogger
(52,657 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(12,212 posts)WestMichRad
(3,365 posts)SS32867
(3 posts)... and John Roberts (along with Thomas and Alito) need to be impeached.
I remember (many years ago) when I respected the Supreme Court.
Lasher
(29,642 posts)President Richard Nixon on November 17, 1973
SergeStorms
(20,768 posts)I hereby nominate the Roberts statement for................(drum roll please)................"The Complete Bullshit Hall of Fame!"
surfered
(14,074 posts)FakeNoose
(42,174 posts)That's a policy decision right there.
The SCOTUS justices are political like never before. And NOW Justice Roberts tries to deflect what they're really doing because he thinks we're stupid.
GiqueCee
(4,604 posts)... is steeped in fermented malice and unrepentant racism. He is not a good person; he is not an honest person. He is a right-wing hate monger who views blatant deceit and corruption as viable tools to institute a new feudalism and total dominion over the lives of others.
His smug smile does not conceal the soulless monster behind it.
Attilatheblond
(9,165 posts)Did he get a bad report on some medical tests? Is he running out of time to put paint over the rot destroying the court under his 'leadership'? Did the fat cats stop lavishing him & his wife with presents?
He's a wanker.
JohnnyRingo
(20,972 posts)He's pretty partisan himself, but no one wears a political party on his sleeve like Thomas and they're very open about it.
During his confirmation hearings Brett Kavanaugh expressed sneering disdain for Democrats.
By his standards DU is kind of on the political fence.
NNadir
(38,423 posts)...politics doesn't exist, at least openly.
Just Jerome
(536 posts)some racist pos that wrote a book, The Way Things Ought To Be?
Johnny reminds me of that fat(not so much anymore) dead guy.
Blue Full Moon
(3,623 posts)Ol Janx Spirit
(1,067 posts)They aren't "purely political" actors.
In fact, they aren't actors at all. They are marionettes dangling at the end of the strings of their Christo-fascist billionaire owners.
And each "performance" gets worse for the audience.
Dave Id
(317 posts)A classic example of 'can't see the forest for the trees?'
BeneteauBum
(709 posts)You interpret the law using that bias. That and enough generosity is applied from moneyed constituents.
Peace ☮️
Ray Bruns
(6,641 posts)in the first place.
sop
(19,153 posts)Americanme
(535 posts)Midnight Writer
(25,668 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(136,972 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,653 posts)samsingh
(18,469 posts)cloudbase
(6,312 posts)You know the rest.
dickthegrouch
(4,614 posts)Or even laughed out loud?
aggiesal
(10,892 posts)When siding with one party (i.e. R's) and against the other party (i.e. D's) for the same law, refering to racial bias.
Basically making it illegal to use racial bias for college entry, but perfectly legal for ICE racial profiling is perfectly fine.
Or allowing illegal gerrymandering for Texas to help (R)'s, but against other states that benefit (D)'s.
Not to mention partying with people that have business in front of SCOTUS.
It goes on & on.
The SCOTUS six-pack are extreme activist justices.
agingdem
(8,945 posts)He's desperate to rewrite his legacy of bigotry, corruption, misogyny, and Trump bend-over toady(nous)...sorry, John, but pronouncing your court above politics is like Trump declaring himself a stable genius...both big fucking lies!
Whip-poor-will
(447 posts)The court's actions speak so loudly I can't hear a word you're saying, johnny smirk face.
2na fisherman
(353 posts)And Leonard Leo conspired to stack this court to be political. It must be reformed to be the non-partisan court it was meant to be. There is just too much power to legislate from the bench with this lot.
dave99
(192 posts)idiot
Martin68
(28,021 posts)RainCaster
(13,848 posts)He's given us:
Trickle down economics
Jim Crowe policies
Criminal immunity for the wealthiest
No healthcare for the poorest
republianmushroom
(22,602 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(14,566 posts)And if my aunt had that and those, she'd be my uncle.
Alliepoo
(2,842 posts)Freaking liar.
dlk
(13,317 posts)n/t
DemocracyForever
(123 posts)If the GOP controlled SCOTUS really ruled based on the constitution and the law, all of the uncounted votes in Florida 2000 would've been counted as the constitution and Florida law required. Instead, they acted like the highly partisan GOP hacks that they are, stopped that legal vote count and installed the fewer vote getting Bush who then appointed Roberts to continue shredding the constitution which he continues to do to this day.
LetMyPeopleVote
(181,525 posts)












