US justice department 'forever' bars IRS from auditing Trump's past tax returns
Source: The Guardian
Addendum quietly slipped into widely criticized agreement creating a $1.7bn fund to compensate presidents allies
The justice department quietly added a provision barring the IRS from auditing Donald Trumps tax returns on Tuesday, amending a widely criticized agreement that creates a secretive and loosely controlled $1.776bn fund to compensate allies of the president.
The addendum, signed by Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, says the government is forever barred and precluded from examining the tax returns of Trump, his family, company and related companies. The agreement applies to anything filed before the agreement was reached. It was posted on the justice department website on Tuesday morning, a day after the department announced creation of the fund.
...
The Tuesday amendment was released shortly after Blanche testified in a Senate hearing in which Democrats harshly criticized the agreement. This is an outrageous, unprecedented slush fund that you set up, said Chris van Hollen, a Maryland senator.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/19/trump-irs-settlement-tax-returns
Because Trump couldn't wait to get money out of this scandal by getting someone to bribe him for a payout from the slush fund; he wants guaranteed money.
As I have already said, he'll end up demanding his tax returns get him the Nobel Prize for Literature.
buzzycrumbhunger
(2,432 posts)These people.
tonekat
(2,599 posts)Everything that belongs to Republicans...just burn it.
Norrrm
(6,167 posts)pat_k
(14,563 posts)Easy to do. Like mixing up... well, i don't know, but they are there doing some damn thing about the law.
greatauntoftriplets
(179,637 posts)I imagine that someone will sue to block this, though where it ends up in the courts is anybody's guess.
Fiendish Thingy
(24,556 posts)The next Dem AG can toss it in the shredder, and Trump can refile his $10 billion lawsuit.
Blanche must know he will be disbarred for this.
angrychair
(12,559 posts)Unless the AG suddenly got pardon power that isn't how any of this works.
I mean Mango Mussolini can pardon himself I guess, which I assume he will do, but the AG cannot pardon anyone.
Grumpy Old Guy
(4,436 posts)...so that he never has to work again.
quakerboy
(14,934 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(24,556 posts)pat_k
(14,563 posts)They actually believe they are "advancing" their careers.
They believe trumpublicanism is our future.
They are like school bullies who stick their fingers in their ears and sing "la la la la" when confronted with anything they don't like to think about.
We have a choice about what the next 10 years will look like. And it's up to us to commit, NOW, to making it so.
Imagine If This Moment Was Not About The Ascent of Authoritarians, But About A New Birth Of Global Freedom...
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221186840
calimary
(91,549 posts)Buddyzbuddy
(3,070 posts)Second, good luck enforcing that beyond the rapist Felons term.
LoisB
(13,784 posts)sboatcar
(931 posts)This edict expires with his time in office.
republianmushroom
(22,938 posts)dweller
(28,994 posts)addendums till the end of the Pisswigs reign to cover all the laws he will continue to break
😑
✌🏻
multigraincracker
(38,375 posts)liberalgunwilltravel
(1,312 posts)IF, and that's a big IF, we return to a country of laws, this agreement will have no force of law.
C_U_L8R
(49,653 posts)Fuck the Trumps feelings and worthless provisions.
lpbk2713
(43,320 posts)Unfuggenbelievable.
Not only Trump but the whole gang of thieves and liars?
mdbl
(9,006 posts)The United States of Corruption.
Katcat
(670 posts)This is totally unacceptable! What use are the democrats if theyre sitting on their hands and acting like Susan Collins!
pat_k
(14,563 posts)I'm not a lawyer, but I can't imagine that ANYTHING about this corrupt agreement is lawful or enforceable upon the IRS or DOJ under legitimate leadership.
orangecrush
(31,932 posts)oldmanlynn
(881 posts)If a Democratic president gets in, he can put in whoever he wants and they can change that. Even Congress could change that when in the Democrats hands.
JohnnyRingo
(21,100 posts)That part should be in bold print
Just in case someone thinks there's an honest person in his heritage.