U.S. Treasury will oversee frozen Iranian funds when they're released, Bessent says
Source: CNBC
Published Wed, Jun 24 2026 7:50 AM EDT Updated 5 Hours Ago
The Treasury Department will oversee Iranian funds when they are released under President Donald Trumps interim Iran agreement, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday on CNBCs Squawk Box. A very large percentage of it will go to buy U.S. foodstuffs and medicines, Bessent said, repeating what the president had said about how the unfrozen funds will be spent.
The administrations pledge has already run into a competing account from Tehran. Iranian officials on Tuesday rejected the idea that Washington or its partners would dictate how Iran spends unfrozen assets, saying any agricultural purchases would be based on price and quality rather than U.S.-imposed terms.
That disagreement underscores a central question hanging over the deal: whether the Treasury will have direct legal control over the money once it is released, or whether the U.S. is describing conditions it hopes to enforce through foreign banks, escrow accounts and sanctions pressure.
Bessent said the unfrozen funds would be overseen by the Treasury in the Middle East, suggesting the administration is trying to place guardrails around one of the most politically sensitive pieces of the agreement: Irans access to frozen assets.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/24/us-treasury-will-oversee-frozen-iranian-funds-when-theyre-released-bessent-says.html
NCDem47
(3,552 posts)Or he'll act like a Mafia boss with it.
Either way...there's NOTHING good faith about any of it.
underpants
(197,834 posts)The Senate just approved the War Powers Act and Iran knows it. They can open or close the Strait like a light switch and they know Trump is DESPERATE to get pump prices down.
Bessent is taking to an audience of one
wolfie001
(8,202 posts)All it took was a scolding from the 34-time felon, p3do Prez.
underpants
(197,834 posts)Response to wolfie001 (Reply #16)
underpants This message was self-deleted by its author.
flashman13
(2,640 posts)IcyPeas
(25,979 posts)lonely bird
(3,123 posts)Yeah, no. I call bullshit.
Javaman
(66,031 posts)karynnj
(61,225 posts)Prairie Gates
(8,671 posts)Even if this goofy scheme is actually true - which is doubtful - all it means is that the Iranians can free up the other money they're spending on food and use that cash for weapons.
How dumb are we supposed to be, honestly.
reACTIONary
(7,435 posts)Quanto Magnus
(1,422 posts)a 10% service fee to be deposited in Trump's account....
Botany
(78,255 posts)Last edited Thu Jun 25, 2026, 08:00 AM - Edit history (1)
For the love of dog who believes a word out of their mouths? Once the money is released to
Iran the Iranians will have control of that money not the U.S. Treasury Department.
Ray Bruns
(6,968 posts)
Aussie105
(8,358 posts)'And WE will decide what goods and at what price!'
(Some handling costs will be included.)
A great deal! - said no one ever.
Skittles
(173,644 posts)Ray Bruns
(6,968 posts)Jose Garcia
(3,567 posts)I'm sure that money they already have and would have been spent on food won't now be spent on nefarious purposes.