A Distinctly Biden Doctrine: Corporate Concentration Violates Worker Rights
https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2024-08-29-biden-doctrine-corporate-concentration-worker-rights/6:20 min. audio at link.
Today on TAP: His disparate government agencies have come together to make this case.
BY HAROLD MEYERSON AUGUST 29, 2024
There are, I dont doubt, any number of Econ 101 classes whose textbooks say that the interests of consumers and workers are necessarily counterposed. When workers get a raise, the increased costs get passed on to consumers; thats just the way of the world.
This narrative is complicated, of course, by the fact that virtually all workers are also consumers, and that the vast majority of consumers are either workers or members of workers families (though knowledge of this nuance may require taking Econ 202 or, alternatively, living in the real world). In recent decades, this narrative has also been complicated by the fact that the level of corporate concentration and the growth of monopolies and monopsonies have reached the point that the typical worker/consumer is disadvantaged in both of those identities.
The federal government has long had departments and agencies established to protect the interest of workers and consumers. The Federal Trade Commission was established in 1914; the National Labor Relations Board in 1935; the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in 1919; and the Department of Labor in 1913. But its only in the last two years, confronted with proposed mergers that would damage the interests of both workers and consumers, that all four of these agencies have begun working together to oppose such combinations. And since its now timely to discuss President Bidens legacy, its clear that its been his appointees to all those agencies and departments who deserve a great deal of credit for tackling many of the problems of monopolized capitalism.
[...]
bucolic_frolic
(46,943 posts)But then some professors knew more about Vladimir Lenin than Milton Friedman.
Stargazer99
(2,928 posts)who tolerates what is obviously destructive to human life. How many times has death and maiming occurred to people (from business not spending the money to make sure no death would occur from their product by checking their products safety) and yet the system is still perused. Doing the same thing over and over again that destroys the planet and human life seems stupid to me...and how does this occur? You are owned by lords of business and if you had critical thinking taught in schools this might improve life by questioning the system. You can bet I will be called down for this thought...profits you know are more important than human life and health as long as the capitalist isn't affected by their product.