Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(49,931 posts)
Sat Mar 22, 2025, 10:38 PM Mar 22

Don't know much about history? I'm here for you, Elon Musk. - Milabnak WaPo (skip if you suffer from hypertension)

(snip)

Musk, growing up in apartheid-era South Africa, probably wasn’t taught to revere constitutional democracy. But what’s the excuse of his colleagues in the Trump administration? They have issued scores of executive orders that flatly contradict the Constitution and the laws of the land. Apparently, they are hoping a submissive Supreme Court will reimagine the Constitution to suit Trump’s whims — and federal judges have reacted as they should, by slapping down these lawless power grabs. As such, the administration is on a prodigious losing streak in court. Judges, in preliminary rulings, have already blocked the administration more than 50 times. Over the past week alone, judges:

(snip)

There’s an obvious reason Trump is getting swatted down so often: He’s breaking the law. Instead of changing course, the administration is now trying to discredit the courts — and the rule of law. White House adviser Stephen Miller denounced “insane edicts of radical rogue judges” and declared that a judge had “no authority” to stop Trump. Border czar Tom Homan went full-on authoritarian on Fox News: “We’re not stopping,” he said of the deportation flights a judge had temporarily halted. “I don’t care what the judges think.”

(snip)

Violations of due process have been alleged in dozens of the cases against Trump’s executive actions: terminating workers and programs; eliminating grants; violating union contracts; denying care to transgender people; banning the Associated Press from the White House; abolishing civil rights enforcement and everything else the administration calls “DEI”; harassing law firms; and summarily deporting migrants. All of these things were done without notice, without recourse, without adjudication and without clarity about which laws give the president the power to do them. “Due process” might sound technical, but it was elemental to our founding and remains at the heart of our legal system. Trump’s flagrant denial of due process is so radical that it isn’t only at odds with 200 years of U.S. law — it’s also contrary to another 600 years of English law before that. For the benefit of Musk (who doesn’t seem to know about such things) and his colleagues (who don’t seem to care), perhaps a refresher is in order.

(snip)

Without due process, you have what we see today: a leader using a wartime statute in peacetime to declare certain people to be dangerous gang members without providing any evidence, then imprisoning them without charges and finally denying the authority of the courts and defying a court order requiring the leader to obey the laws as written. It is no exaggeration to say that this is the road to despotism.

(snip)

The sabotage of the federal government continues, as recklessly as before: dramatically cutting Social Security staff, offices and phone support while simultaneously requiring millions more of the elderly and disabled to apply for benefits in person rather than online; slashing the taxpayer help staff at the IRS and calling off audits; scaling back scientific research at the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institutes of Health. Paul Dans, the former chief of Project 2025, told Politico that there “is almost no difference between Project 2025 and what Trump was planning all along and is now implementing.”

(snip)

Trump, in his appearance at DOJ, said negative coverage of him on CNN and MSNBC “has to be illegal.” He proclaimed that Biden’s use of the pardon, a constitutional power, to preemptively protect members of the House Jan. 6 committee from Trump’s harassment was “null and void.” He fired the two Democratic commissioners from the Federal Trade Commission, his latest defiance of federal statutes protecting independent commissions. His administration fired the board of the independent U.S. Institute of Peace and seized control of its building, physically removing its president and threatening prosecution.

More..

https://wapo.st/4bVwJjM

free




6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Don't know much about history? I'm here for you, Elon Musk. - Milabnak WaPo (skip if you suffer from hypertension) (Original Post) question everything Mar 22 OP
And yet I still see Comenntators and Podcasters celebrating judicial decisions Otto_Harper Mar 22 #1
Great article. Thanks. Good to see WaPo publishing this. Silent Type Mar 22 #2
"Despotism" IrishBubbaLiberal Mar 22 #3
We were well down that road when Bush started this, and we're now at the "final exit for Democracy" but we'll probably LT Barclay Mar 23 #6
Aren't these the same guys obsessed with procedural question for the FISA court. CincyDem Mar 22 #4
I think this article is excellent! FormerOstrich Mar 23 #5

Otto_Harper

(822 posts)
1. And yet I still see Comenntators and Podcasters celebrating judicial decisions
Sat Mar 22, 2025, 10:45 PM
Mar 22

as "Bombshells Dropped on The Administration", due, I guess to normalcy bias, when they have no real impact at all.

IrishBubbaLiberal

(1,160 posts)
3. "Despotism"
Sat Mar 22, 2025, 11:03 PM
Mar 22

This part….Wow.


Without due process, you have what we see today: a leader using a wartime statute in peacetime to declare certain people to be dangerous gang members without providing any evidence, then imprisoning them without charges and finally denying the authority of the courts and defying a court order requiring the leader to obey the laws as written. It is no exaggeration to say that this is the road to despotism.

LT Barclay

(2,888 posts)
6. We were well down that road when Bush started this, and we're now at the "final exit for Democracy" but we'll probably
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 02:19 AM
Mar 23

cruise right by that one too.

CincyDem

(7,055 posts)
4. Aren't these the same guys obsessed with procedural question for the FISA court.
Sat Mar 22, 2025, 11:08 PM
Mar 22

Guess that procedural obligation went out the window when a R moved into 1600.

FormerOstrich

(2,809 posts)
5. I think this article is excellent!
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 01:42 AM
Mar 23

I still have a subscription to the Washington Post. I know they have compromised but I am pleasantly surprised on some of what they are publishing, such as this.

I have to say the AI summary of the comments on their articles really are uplifting. All of them, or all of them I have read which are many, are overwhelmingly critical of the "Trump Agenda", Musk, and Dodge. It's like the majority of Washington Post commenters are like us.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Don't know much about his...