Some Democrats Endorse Bill Allowing Elon Musk to Create His Own Currency
The GENIUS Act is the first pro-crypto bill Republicans want to rush through this Congress. Thanks to industry money, several Democrats are ignoring the bill’s major problems.by David Dayen
March 10, 2025
The crypto industry spent lavishly to buy a friendly Congress in the 2024 elections, with their donations making up almost half of all corporate donations to PACs last year. They hope this week will begin the return on that investment—with assistance from Senate Democrats.
The Senate Banking Committee is expected this week to mark up the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, a Republican-led bill co-sponsored by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), the new chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Gillibrand has worked for years to push industry-friendly crypto legislation through Congress, and she may have hit on a winning formula, with a critical mass of Democrats having received millions from crypto PACs and ready to collaborate with Republicans and the Trump White House.
But consumer protection advocates, other senators, and even crypto-leaning regulators have warned that the GENIUS Act would create a Wild West in stablecoins, provide weak standards, deprive users of financial security, and give Big Tech firms (like Elon Musk’s X) the ability to create a lightly monitored private currency.
https://prospect.org/power/2025-03-10-some-democrats-endorse-bill-allowing-elon-musk-create-own-currency/
Rather obvious who enables Trump/Musk and who does not.
Joseph Stiglitz: Bitcoin ought to be outlawed
The World Economic Forum
https://www.weforum.org › stories › 2017/11 › joseph-...
Nov 30, 2017 — Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has said the cryptocurrency 'doesn't serve any useful function'.

SheltieLover
(65,750 posts)
Passages
(2,432 posts)He has had this viewpoint for many years now.
SheltieLover
(65,750 posts)Not much else imo.
highplainsdem
(55,164 posts)Passages
(2,432 posts)Our leadership depends, imho, on making these kinds of alliances deal-breakers.
You don't get to do this and then it is business as usual. You don't get to keep committee chairs etc when you clearly are compromised.
LymphocyteLover
(7,669 posts)Historic NY
(38,742 posts)the like no one has ever seen.
Passages
(2,432 posts)Irish_Dem
(67,223 posts)LisaM
(29,086 posts)They thought a Harris administration would be more friendly to crypto.
I'm flabbergasted that anyone would think it was stable in any sense of the word.
Think. Again.
(22,330 posts)louis-t
(24,129 posts)of Tesla? Just like the co-presidents, his crypto won't serve any useful function.
slightlv
(5,245 posts)but I can sure see the evil surrounding it. If the criminals and oligarchs want it so badly, that ought to be the "tell" that it's to the normal person's detriment.
All I've seen it do is bankrupt people (or come close to it), and be a great vehicle for laundering money. It squanders our planet's finite resources for the advantage of a very few people and is not accepted anywhere else as legitimate currency. If they want private currency so bad, why don't they just take out their old board games of Monopoly and use the play money that came with it? Seems to be about the same, to me. Like I said, this may be one of those things I really am just too old to "get." And I am willing to admit it.
iemanja
(55,758 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(120,949 posts)He can have his own country. Call it Muskatania.