Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Passages

(2,432 posts)
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 12:28 PM Mar 23

Some Democrats Endorse Bill Allowing Elon Musk to Create His Own Currency

The GENIUS Act is the first pro-crypto bill Republicans want to rush through this Congress. Thanks to industry money, several Democrats are ignoring the bill’s major problems.

by David Dayen

March 10, 2025

The crypto industry spent lavishly to buy a friendly Congress in the 2024 elections, with their donations making up almost half of all corporate donations to PACs last year. They hope this week will begin the return on that investment—with assistance from Senate Democrats.

The Senate Banking Committee is expected this week to mark up the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, a Republican-led bill co-sponsored by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), the new chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Gillibrand has worked for years to push industry-friendly crypto legislation through Congress, and she may have hit on a winning formula, with a critical mass of Democrats having received millions from crypto PACs and ready to collaborate with Republicans and the Trump White House.

But consumer protection advocates, other senators, and even crypto-leaning regulators have warned that the GENIUS Act would create a Wild West in stablecoins, provide weak standards, deprive users of financial security, and give Big Tech firms (like Elon Musk’s X) the ability to create a lightly monitored private currency.

https://prospect.org/power/2025-03-10-some-democrats-endorse-bill-allowing-elon-musk-create-own-currency/

Rather obvious who enables Trump/Musk and who does not.

Joseph Stiglitz: Bitcoin ought to be outlawed
The World Economic Forum
https://www.weforum.org › stories › 2017/11 › joseph-...
Nov 30, 2017 — Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has said the cryptocurrency 'doesn't serve any useful function'.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Passages

(2,432 posts)
6. It is disturbing.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 12:36 PM
Mar 23

Our leadership depends, imho, on making these kinds of alliances deal-breakers.

You don't get to do this and then it is business as usual. You don't get to keep committee chairs etc when you clearly are compromised.

Historic NY

(38,742 posts)
5. If they blow US Treasury taxpayer money there will be a blood bath
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 12:33 PM
Mar 23

the like no one has ever seen.

LisaM

(29,086 posts)
9. I remember an article about the crypto people helping force out Biden.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 12:46 PM
Mar 23

They thought a Harris administration would be more friendly to crypto.

I'm flabbergasted that anyone would think it was stable in any sense of the word.

Think. Again.

(22,330 posts)
10. From the lnked article...
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 01:06 PM
Mar 23
That the GENIUS bill is a priority for the White House and the Senate Republican leadership, to be rushed through Congress in the first hundred days, has not deterred Democrats from backing it. But in the context of President Trump’s illegal dismantling of agencies and commandeering of Congress’s power of the purse, his maneuvers on crypto in particular make it confounding why Democrats would throw their support his way.

louis-t

(24,129 posts)
11. His own money backed by "Full Faith and Credit"
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 01:08 PM
Mar 23

of Tesla? Just like the co-presidents, his crypto won't serve any useful function.

slightlv

(5,245 posts)
13. Maybe I'm just too old to see any good that can come from this,
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:54 AM
Mar 24

but I can sure see the evil surrounding it. If the criminals and oligarchs want it so badly, that ought to be the "tell" that it's to the normal person's detriment.

All I've seen it do is bankrupt people (or come close to it), and be a great vehicle for laundering money. It squanders our planet's finite resources for the advantage of a very few people and is not accepted anywhere else as legitimate currency. If they want private currency so bad, why don't they just take out their old board games of Monopoly and use the play money that came with it? Seems to be about the same, to me. Like I said, this may be one of those things I really am just too old to "get." And I am willing to admit it.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(120,949 posts)
15. Only if you want to maroon him on a desert island
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 02:35 PM
Mar 24

He can have his own country. Call it Muskatania.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Some Democrats Endorse Bi...