JD Vance's role in Signal chat angers senior Republican lawmakers

[Dulcinea]

(NBC News) WASHINGTON — Vice President JD Vance’s last-minute concerns about President Donald Trump’s decision to strike the Houthis in Yemen, raised in a now-public Signal chat with other top U.S. officials, have left senior Republican lawmakers angry.

Some are upset because they think Vance was trying to block a directive from Trump. Others, reflecting a broader debate inside the administration and the GOP over the wisdom of embarking on a stepped-up campaign against the militant group, are upset about the side he took.

Trump has campaigned and governed on the idea that America should be put first and its traditional allies and conflicts overseas second. But his administration is now making moves that reflect the potential for a protracted military campaign against the Houthis.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/jd-vances-role-signal-chat-130008838.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&segment_id=DY_VTO_CORE&ncid=crm_19908-1475736-20250331-0-&bt_user_id=%2FI1v8G0%2BO9IootgFPeCg2icupnvDWXy9aSYHOC3AmnpU854g6tY0LxmInfq4pwqc&bt_ts=1743420264817

[gab13by13]

1. I thought this post was going to be about Magats mad about the use of Signal.

Lol, SignalGate is dead, when the weather improves time to go golfing.

[Skittles]

3. NOTHING TO SEE HERE, MOVE ALONG

FROM THE SAME ASSHOLES WHO SPENT 800 CONGRESSIONAL HOURS WHINING ABOUT HILLARY'S EMAILS

[Grins]

2. ".. angers senior Republican lawmakers," who wish to remain ANONYMOUS!

There fixed it.

Who cares if they are “angered?”