Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
How a GOP accounting maneuver hides $3.8 trillion in red ink from Trump's 'big, beautiful bill
Yahoo Finance
How a GOP accounting maneuver hides $3.8 trillion in red ink from Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'
Ben Werschkul Washington Correspondent
Thu, June 26, 2025 at 12:09 PM EDT
3 min read
As Senate Republicans barrel toward votes in the coming days on President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, they are using a controversial budget maneuver to hide $3.8 trillion in red ink.
This Senate-preferred accounting approach is known as using a "current policy baseline" and takes the stance that extending current tax rates should be counted as having zero cost even if they are set to expire.
What doesn't change is the underlying fact that those changes are projected to add trillions to the national debt if they become law. … The approach is being derided as an "egregious budget gimmick" and upends decades of accounting practices with trillions in economic consequences.
This bit of Washington arcana was front and center this week after the Joint Committee on Taxation analyzed the tax provisions in the bill using this "current policy" approach and found a total cost of about $442 billion in the coming decade.
{snip}
How a GOP accounting maneuver hides $3.8 trillion in red ink from Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'
Ben Werschkul Washington Correspondent
Thu, June 26, 2025 at 12:09 PM EDT
3 min read
As Senate Republicans barrel toward votes in the coming days on President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, they are using a controversial budget maneuver to hide $3.8 trillion in red ink.
This Senate-preferred accounting approach is known as using a "current policy baseline" and takes the stance that extending current tax rates should be counted as having zero cost even if they are set to expire.
What doesn't change is the underlying fact that those changes are projected to add trillions to the national debt if they become law. … The approach is being derided as an "egregious budget gimmick" and upends decades of accounting practices with trillions in economic consequences.
This bit of Washington arcana was front and center this week after the Joint Committee on Taxation analyzed the tax provisions in the bill using this "current policy" approach and found a total cost of about $442 billion in the coming decade.
{snip}