Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

milestogo

(21,046 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2025, 06:31 PM 14 hrs ago

By Ruling Against Nationwide Injunctions, SCOTUS Affirms the Imperial Presidency

By Marjorie Cohn , Truthout
Published June 30, 2025

SCOTUS stripped federal judges of their authority to protect people throughout the US when the president breaks the law.

Continuing in their shameful deference to the president, Donald Trump’s lackeys on the Supreme Court once again affirmed the superiority of the executive over the other two branches of government. Last year, the high court ruled that presidents are immune from prosecution when they carry out official functions. Now, that same court has stripped federal judges of their authority to protect people throughout the nation when the president breaks the law.

More than two dozen nationwide (“universal”) injunctions blocking several of Trump’s policies were in effect as of mid-May. Those policies include a more stringent voter ID requirement; a rule requiring that mail-in ballots be received by Election Day; an effort to freeze $3 trillion in federal spending to review whether the disbursement of those funds aligned with administration policies; a demand that public schools eliminate DEI programs or risk losing some of the $75 billion in federal funds; and allowing over 25,000 children to enter deportation proceedings without lawyers.

Trump v. CASA, Inc. came to the Supreme Court as a challenge to Trump’s January 20 executive order purporting to unilaterally outlaw the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship. But in its June 27 ruling, the high court didn’t actually decide the citizenship issue, which they kicked back to the lower federal courts. Instead, in a shocking decision, the Supreme Court held that federal judges cannot issue universal injunctions for actions that are almost certainly illegal. “Never before has the Supreme Court imposed such restrictions on the ability of courts to provide relief against unconstitutional acts,” Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky wrote in the Los Angeles Times.

The Supreme Court granted the request by the Trump administration to partially pause three federal court rulings that had blocked Trump’s executive order. Those courts had determined that only nationwide injunctions would provide the plaintiffs with complete relief because people constantly move in and out of states, and children born to noncitizen parents in a non-plaintiff state may later reside in a plaintiff state, and vice versa.

https://truthout.org/articles/by-ruling-against-nationwide-injunctions-scotus-affirms-the-imperial-presidency/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
By Ruling Against Nationwide Injunctions, SCOTUS Affirms the Imperial Presidency (Original Post) milestogo 14 hrs ago OP
Does this mean Kacsmyrak can't outlaw abortion meds? Easterncedar 13 hrs ago #1
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»By Ruling Against Nationw...