Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
What did the people of the Cotswolds do to deserve a visit from JD Vance?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/21/cotswolds-jd-vance-family-holidayWhat did the people of the Cotswolds do to deserve a visit from JD Vance?
Zoe Williams
The US vice-president has chosen to holiday among the Chipping Norton set, which includes Boris Johnson and Jeremy Clarkson, in a country he says has gone to the dogs. It feels like he is trolling the UK …
Mon 21 Jul 2025 09.30 EDT
You have to let politicians go on holiday, I guess. You have to accept the existence of world leaders with whose views you disagree, especially now that it’s almost all of them. So why does it feel like a particular provocation for JD Vance to be planning a trip to the Cotswolds? His itinerary isn’t yet known, but its bare bones are that, sometime in August, the Vances will visit London, Oxfordshire and Scotland.
For a recap on what, exactly, is wrong with the US vice-president, there is nothing more evocative than February’s press conference with Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Of course, many of Vance’s more extreme views – calling Democratic politicians a “bunch of childless cat ladies with miserable lives”, claiming that staying in an abusive relationship was preferable to getting divorced, and saying that abortion should be banned – were already well known, from a combination of his voting record and his memoir, Hillbilly Elegy. But Republicans say a lot of things, particularly while seeking election. You may have been able to infer Vance’s drive to dominate and control others, but it wasn’t until that exchange with the Ukrainian president that you could witness it.
Legacy media struggled with the right language to describe that press conference: the BBC called it an “angry spat”, CNN got a little bit closer to the mark when it said Zelenskyy “bristled” at his “berating”. To any normal human listening to it, unfettered by a muddled commitment to impartiality, it was bullying. Any description that fell short of picking a side, that did not say “Trump and Vance set out to humiliate Zelenskyy”, felt like a whitewash. Against a backdrop of implied financial control, Vance’s repeated demands – “You should be thanking the president”; “Have you even said, ‘thank you’ once?” – were for public abasement, and it was strange, disgusting and sullying to witness.
Two weeks before that, Vance had indulged in a mass gaslighting event at the Munich conference, claiming that Christians were persecuted in the UK, private prayer at home could be banned in Scotland, the EU had overturned an election in Romania, and freedom of expression was at risk in Germany, Sweden, almost everywhere, in fact, since Europe had gone off the rails. It felt strange and unsettling to hear him use this language – humiliation, defiant untruth, his upside down world in which the victim is painted as the offender are components of coercive control. It is infinitely preferable to avert your eyes than to consider what this means for the rules-based international order.
…
Zoe Williams
The US vice-president has chosen to holiday among the Chipping Norton set, which includes Boris Johnson and Jeremy Clarkson, in a country he says has gone to the dogs. It feels like he is trolling the UK …
Mon 21 Jul 2025 09.30 EDT
You have to let politicians go on holiday, I guess. You have to accept the existence of world leaders with whose views you disagree, especially now that it’s almost all of them. So why does it feel like a particular provocation for JD Vance to be planning a trip to the Cotswolds? His itinerary isn’t yet known, but its bare bones are that, sometime in August, the Vances will visit London, Oxfordshire and Scotland.
For a recap on what, exactly, is wrong with the US vice-president, there is nothing more evocative than February’s press conference with Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Of course, many of Vance’s more extreme views – calling Democratic politicians a “bunch of childless cat ladies with miserable lives”, claiming that staying in an abusive relationship was preferable to getting divorced, and saying that abortion should be banned – were already well known, from a combination of his voting record and his memoir, Hillbilly Elegy. But Republicans say a lot of things, particularly while seeking election. You may have been able to infer Vance’s drive to dominate and control others, but it wasn’t until that exchange with the Ukrainian president that you could witness it.
Legacy media struggled with the right language to describe that press conference: the BBC called it an “angry spat”, CNN got a little bit closer to the mark when it said Zelenskyy “bristled” at his “berating”. To any normal human listening to it, unfettered by a muddled commitment to impartiality, it was bullying. Any description that fell short of picking a side, that did not say “Trump and Vance set out to humiliate Zelenskyy”, felt like a whitewash. Against a backdrop of implied financial control, Vance’s repeated demands – “You should be thanking the president”; “Have you even said, ‘thank you’ once?” – were for public abasement, and it was strange, disgusting and sullying to witness.
Two weeks before that, Vance had indulged in a mass gaslighting event at the Munich conference, claiming that Christians were persecuted in the UK, private prayer at home could be banned in Scotland, the EU had overturned an election in Romania, and freedom of expression was at risk in Germany, Sweden, almost everywhere, in fact, since Europe had gone off the rails. It felt strange and unsettling to hear him use this language – humiliation, defiant untruth, his upside down world in which the victim is painted as the offender are components of coercive control. It is infinitely preferable to avert your eyes than to consider what this means for the rules-based international order.
…
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
