Photography
Related: About this forumEasterncedar
(5,115 posts)It makes me want, for the first time, to learn the names of all those features I can see so clearly now. Thanks for the wonderful sight!
Mousetoescamper
(6,819 posts)riverbendviewgal
(4,373 posts)Such an awesome photo. Than you for sharing.
Mousetoescamper
(6,819 posts)KS Toronado
(21,661 posts)Mousetoescamper
(6,819 posts)John1956PA
(4,566 posts)Is the image rotated ninety degrees clockwise?
Mousetoescamper
(6,819 posts)The image isn't rotated.
John1956PA
(4,566 posts)
The discrepancy in rotation between the two images seems to be 90 degrees.
Mousetoescamper
(6,819 posts)My photo was taken at 12:13 AM today.
John1956PA
(4,566 posts)The orientation of the lunarscape in my photo is about 45 degrees counterclockwise from the orientation shown in the above image from Fourmilab. I think that the Fourmilab image shows the moon as it appeared on midnight on December 12.

Mousetoescamper
(6,819 posts)What's your point with this exercise? What do you require?
CaliforniaPeggy
(155,475 posts)Words fail me.
I've never seen the moon at this angle before. It looks so spherical, so luminous. I am gobsmacked!
Mousetoescamper
(6,819 posts)The sky was clear and the moon was nearly full (coming Dec. 15). I don't usually try to shoot this phase because it lacks the shadows that make the craters and mountains pop. As an experiment I matched the exposure time to the ISO. The photo turned out better than expected.
ISO 100 (my usual setting for the moon)
f16
1/100 sec
