California Democratic Party / Official Nov 8 2022 State Proposition Endorsements

[Auggie]

https://cadem.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/CADEM-Prop-Updated_2.pdf

1) Yes -- Places fundamental right to abortion & the right to contraceptives in the CA Constitution

26) Neutral -- Authorizes new types of gambling.

27) No -- Out-of-state corps. take 90% of money. No real CA investment or jobs. 50+ CA tribes oppose

28) Yes -- Ensures ALL students in public schools get arts and music education – without raising taxes

29) Yes -- Protects dialysis patients by increasing clinic safety measures

30) Yes -- Prevents wildfires and reduces tailpipe pollution. Lower climate emissions, cleaner air

31) Yes -- Protects kids from Big Tobacco by ending the sale of candy-flavored tobacco and menthols

Board of Equalization endorsements: https://cadem.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2022-CADEM-General-Endorsements.pdf

Homepage link: https://cadem.org/endorsements/

[Lovie777]

1. ????? on Prop 26 ......

[Auggie]

2. I'm curious also ...

but I've decided to vote NO on 26.

[quaint]

3. 29) Protects dialysis patients: Expenditures

From CalMatters

A total of $86.3M has been invested in this race. There haven't been any independent expenditures, yet. Independent expenditures are when companies and organizations spend to support or oppose campaigns. There are no spending limits.

The last time we checked for new data was September 20 at 5:40 PM.

OPPONENTS have raised $86.3M (No independent expenditures)
SUPPORTERS have raised $0 (No independent expenditures)

This is so telling. Third time on the ballot and their unlimited funds haven't fooled us yet.

[Auggie]

4. The money opponents have spent to defeat these props ...

would go a long way towards helping dialysis patients.

[Brother Buzz]

10. A boatload of money

The YouTube is deluged with their ads, tugging the heartstrings, and I just received the mailer.

[quaint]

5. I'm NO on both 26 and 27.

CalMatters
Here’s what each initiative does

The “California Sports Wagering Regulation and Unlawful Gambling Enforcement Act” {26} is backed by a group of Native American tribes and is currently eligible for the ballot. It would allow tribal casinos and the state’s four horse race tracks to offer sports betting. It would also allow tribal casinos to expand their gambling offerings to roulette and dice games.

Meanwhile, the “California Solutions to Homelessness and Mental Health Act” {27} is backed by several large sports betting companies, including FanDuel, DraftKings, and BetMGM. It would legalize online sports betting outside of Native American lands, and allow gaming companies to offer online sports betting if they partner with a tribe. Election officials are reviewing the signatures for this initiative — if enough are valid, it too will be eligible for the ballot.

Your guide to sports betting and everything else to know about gambling in California
Lots of good information.

NO on 27
More good information.

[Beatlelvr]

6. I'm voting yes on 26, no on 27

But curious about 30. I think gov. Newsom has done some No on 30 tv spots.

[quaint]

7. Prop 30, What would it do?

From CalMatters (lots more on this proposition there).

Prop. 30 would impose a 1.75% personal income tax increase on Californians making more than $2 million per year to fund a suite of climate programs. The goal is to clean up the state’s dirty air and help meet ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets.

The proposition creates a new revenue stream to subsidize zero-emission vehicles and fund wildfire response and prevention — between $3.5 billion to $5 billion annually, growing over time, according to state analysts.

Most of the money — about 80% — would go towards rebates for people buying zero-emission cars and to build more charging stations. Half of that funding will go to low- and middle-income residents, who are disproportionately affected by poor air quality and heavy pollution. The state already spends millions each year on zero-emission vehicle programs and dedicated an additional $10 billion over the next five years to those programs in this year’s budget.

A quarter of the tax money would provide funding to hire and train firefighters, who are battling increasingly worsening wildfires. On average, the state spends about $2 billion to $4 billion annually putting out wildfires.

The tax would go into effect in January 2023 and would end by January 2043, or possibly earlier, if the state is able to slash its emissions to at least 80% below 1990 levels for three consecutive calendar years.

[quaint]

9. Prop 30: Why mayors of SJ, Oakland and Newsom are on opposite sides of the EV ballot measure

ABC7News September 20

One of the biggest financial contributors to Prop 30 is rideshare company Lyft who has poured millions into it.

Though Prop 30 has received backing from the California Democratic Party, it's also opposed by the California Republican Party and other groups.

They say Lyft is trying to get taxpayers to help them meet a state mandate to eventually electrify their fleet.

"It's a big tax increase that disproportionately benefits, a few large corporations," Newsom said, "There was one large corporation, wonderful company, that's going to be one of the lion's share beneficiaries of raising everybody else's taxes to direct money in an area where we just passed the largest appropriation and the largest budget in U.S. history." Newsome quote

[roody]

8. 26 is also bad for native american interests.