Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,868 posts)
Sat Sep 28, 2024, 05:23 AM Sep 28

Jury acquits man on all counts in attacks targeting gay men in Meridian Hill Park

Jury acquits man on all counts in attacks targeting gay men in Meridian Hill Park

Michael Thomas Pruden, of Norfolk, was found not guilty of all charges following two days of deliberations.

Author: Jordan Fischer
Published: 5:05 PM EDT September 27, 2024
Updated: 5:05 PM EDT September 27, 2024

WASHINGTON — A federal grand jury acquitted a Virginia man on all counts against him Friday in connection to a series of attacks targeting gay men in D.C.’s Meridian Hill Park in 2021. … Jurors deliberated across two days before returning a not guilty verdict on all six counts against Michael Thomas Pruden, 50, of Norfolk. A seventh count was dismissed by the government last week prior to the beginning of trial.

Pruden was indicted in July 2022 on multiple counts of assault and impersonating a federal officer, along with a hate crimes enhancement. At the time, federal investigators claimed between April 2018 and March 2021 Pruden had attacked at least five different men with pepper spray in Meridian Hill Park, also known as Malcom X Park, near 16th and U Streets in D.C.

Prosecutors said the park is informally known as a “cruising” spot for gay men and alleged the crimes were motivated by anti-gay bias. … According to the indictment, the suspect in that case had approached victims with a flashlight, given “police-style commands” and then sprayed them with a chemical irritant.

Friday’s verdict marks the second time Pruden, a former Maryland elementary school teacher, has been acquitted of assaults in the D.C. area. In 2021, Pruden was charged in connection with an alleged assault at Daingerfeld Island in Alexandria. An indictment returned by a federal grand jury in that case accused Pruden of one count of assault with the intent to do bodily harm for allegedly attacking another person with pepper spray and a tree branch. A jury in the Eastern District of Virginia acquitted Pruden on that count in August of that same year. … Pruden was represented by assistant federal public defenders Alexis Morgan Gardner and Courtney Millian from the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Columbia.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jury acquits man on all counts in attacks targeting gay men in Meridian Hill Park (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Sep 28 OP
One step forward... five steps back. OldBaldy1701E Sep 28 #1
would sure like to know what the testimony stopdiggin Sep 28 #2
Why? catrose Sep 28 #3
I was present CuriousGeorge17 Sep 29 #4

OldBaldy1701E

(6,320 posts)
1. One step forward... five steps back.
Sat Sep 28, 2024, 05:49 AM
Sep 28

It isn't the exception', it is the rule. Until that changes, all of the LGBTQA people in this nation are in danger.

stopdiggin

(12,801 posts)
2. would sure like to know what the testimony
Sat Sep 28, 2024, 11:31 AM
Sep 28

(and jury deliberation?) sounded like in this case. Regardless, it's almost impossible to place the blame here anywhere else than on a jury that refused to be persuaded ... Police did their job. Prosecutors did their job ...

catrose

(5,236 posts)
3. Why?
Sat Sep 28, 2024, 01:13 PM
Sep 28

Prosecutor wouldn’t have brought the case without evidence.
Would he?
Why would a jury ignore evidence?
3 times
Are there that many homophobes in the jury pool?

4. I was present
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:21 PM
Sep 29

I was present at this trial. The police conducted very sloppy witness interviews and provided almost no other evidence on the man. They absolutely did not meet the burden of proof for a conviction.

The real question that should be asked is why the police did not collect what would have been common sense evidence from witnesses, call witnesses they were expected to call or adhere to best practices with their witness interviews.

No jury would have convicted this man in the evidence submitted.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»District of Columbia»Jury acquits man on all c...