Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wicked Blue

(7,759 posts)
Mon Feb 10, 2025, 12:14 PM Feb 10

$7B plan could save Jersey Shore from flooding. But none of that would pay people to leave.

-snip-

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is working now on an extensive $7.6 billion plan to bolster Jersey’s back bays throughout nearly 3,400 miles of shoreline across 89 towns.

The help will be needed, considering how much New Jersey has continued to develop in some of the most at-risk areas — and how much scientists project climate change will exacerbate sea level rise and translate to stronger storms.

A 378-page report outlining the latest Back Bays assessment and plan was released in December and is under review now.

Federal planners, through a push from Congressional funds like they rely on for beach replenishments, would accomplish more back bay protections by elevating over 6,000 homes and reinforcing police and fire stations, as well as other vital infrastructure such as hospitals and nursing homes, the agency said.

https://www.nj.com/atlantic/2025/02/7b-plan-could-save-jersey-shores-from-flooding-but-none-of-that-would-pay-people-to-leave.html

A 2021 plan proposed elevating almost 19,000 homes and using flood gates and internal waterway barriers. The latest proposal reduces the number of elevations and includes restoration of salt marshes to soak up floodwaters.

Ross Kushner of the NJ Coastal Alliance says the plan should focus on managed retreat, buying up homes along the shore and converting them into open space. But this, he said, is politically unpopular.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$7B plan could save Jersey Shore from flooding. But none of that would pay people to leave. (Original Post) Wicked Blue Feb 10 OP
How about moving the homes inland? bucolic_frolic Feb 10 #1
If ya ain't been there, these are homes that are build on the shore.... some are 50 -100 feet from high tide mark. 3Hotdogs Feb 10 #2

bucolic_frolic

(49,478 posts)
1. How about moving the homes inland?
Mon Feb 10, 2025, 12:22 PM
Feb 10

Salvage operation, move them in parts. Sell off quarters of homes for framing for new low-income housing. Gut and insulate. I surely don't have the economics right on it, but they've got to start somewhere.

3Hotdogs

(14,038 posts)
2. If ya ain't been there, these are homes that are build on the shore.... some are 50 -100 feet from high tide mark.
Mon Feb 10, 2025, 04:32 PM
Feb 10

An acquaintance bought a house on Long Beach Island for $2m. His wife is president of some company and she commutes from LBI to NYC on weekends. She owns AN ENTIRE FLOOR of the former Ansonia Hotel.

Anyways, they tore down the $2m house to rebuild a $12m house.

Now I don't expect any sympathy from you because you probably never suffered from the disease, affluenza. But it is totally unacceptable to expect people like this to give up their weekend houses.

--- and there are a few thousand of them along the N.J. coast.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»$7B plan could save Jerse...