Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
161 homes in tower block on Chalcots estate in Camden, north London, to be evacuated due to concerns (Original Post) steve2470 Jun 2017 OP
There will probably more buildings to follow. procon Jun 2017 #1
Wow LeftishBrit Jun 2017 #2
Judging by how Grenfell tower survivors are being treated T_i_B Jun 2017 #3
Now 800 homes - TV saying 4000 people muriel_volestrangler Jun 2017 #4
Tip of the Iceberg. JawJaw Jun 2017 #5

LeftishBrit

(41,303 posts)
2. Wow
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 03:03 PM
Jun 2017

Better that they find out now than after a fire.

Hope the council finds them decent alternative accommodation.

T_i_B

(14,800 posts)
3. Judging by how Grenfell tower survivors are being treated
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 03:41 PM
Jun 2017

I'm not hopeful, although you would hope that Camden is a lot less NIMBY-ist than Kensington.

JawJaw

(722 posts)
5. Tip of the Iceberg.
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 12:04 PM
Jun 2017

At present the only mandatory checks on cladding are being DEMANDED for local council owned/managed tower blocks. I understand that ALL of the samples tested have failed!

What's NOT being reported is that this sort of cladding and insulations must have been used in many privately owned blocks or student accommodation blocks, and the government merely ASKS that owners/managers carry out testing!

There are huge implications in terms of costs and liabilities for testing, replacement or improvements to building fire safety, but I really can't get my head around the fact that residents of council owned properties are apparently being treated (quite rightly) as living in potential death-traps, but the residents of other residential tower accommodation are just being left to the whim of their building landlord/managing agent.

The only conclusion I can come to is that the government is fully aware that the problem is MUCH bigger than most people realise, and that the system of checking/temporarily rehousing residents would completely breakdown with the additional burden of private blocks.

They're already teetering on the brink of political oblivion, so I think they're trying to avoid rocking the boat too much.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»161 homes in tower block ...