Has anyone seen this statistical analysis?

[rumpel]

It is on YouTube : unveiling the truth: Election Result Discrepancies Nathan Taylor from Election Truth Alliance.
It has been many moons since I posted and even was active here.

?si=6trjcI54U3FzbSJj
But I would like to hear comments. For me the most compelling part was the graphs on “drop offs “.

[AZJonnie]

1. Welcome back, and I don't mean to rain on this parade, but the election's over :(

People could literally provide iron clad proof in the form of hand-written orders and plans from Trump and Musk describing exactly how the election theft would work, and provide unassailable documentation proving that the plans were carried out, and that it threw the election to Trump over Harris ... and nothing would happen. The only mechanisms to remove Trump is impeachment and removal, or the 25th. Both of which have 0% chance of happening, even with such proof. As such, I don't really 'get' the point of anything resembling this analysis. The time for all this is over

EDIT: Although I suppose it would be helpful to learn the mechanism used to prevent it in the future. Forgot about that point. That could be valuable.

[radicalbeer]

2. Important and pertinent

This is an important and pertinent analysis of our electoral system.
I have worked with complicated systems for a long time. One of the basic tenants of solving complicated problems is to analyze what went wrong as soon as possible.
Actually solving the problem will take time; more time than most people are willing to acknowledge. In most cases, it would be completely useless to attempt to fix the problem just before the next time the system is being used. It will definitely be to late when maybe people see the problem in action.

However, it will never be fixed if people don't even agree that there is a problem.

The value of this analysis is that it raises reasonable questions - along with statistical analysis to back it up - about our election integrity. If anyone has doubts about the analysis, back them up with a reasonably scientific approach.

The more people who are actually discussing the problem the better. More people looking at the problem and and at least agreeing that there is a problem the better. This is the baseline for attempting to find a solution.

Implementing a solution to the problem will take a lot of effort. In this case, it will have stiff political opposition. But if there's any chance that it can be solved, it will require the backing of the Democratic party. The Republicans won't fix it out of good will and honesty.