Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sector 001

(369 posts)
Thu Apr 30, 2026, 10:32 PM Thursday

Copy Fail: This Exploit Gives Root Access on Linux - SavvyNik

Last edited Fri May 1, 2026, 12:04 PM - Edit history (1)




Big Linux Exploit Just Happened - ThioJoe


This Exploits LITERALLY Every Linux Distro
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Copy Fail: This Exploit Gives Root Access on Linux - SavvyNik (Original Post) Sector 001 Thursday OP
Text version ? nt eppur_se_muova Thursday #1
👀 Sector 001 Thursday #2
Thanks ! bookmarking. nt eppur_se_muova Thursday #3
It looks like developers are already on this ... rog Thursday #4
This exploit is nine years old. Sector 001 Thursday #5
Actually the word is that it has not (yet) been seen in the wild. rog Friday #7
Welcome to my ignore list. Sector 001 Friday #8
Wow - that caught me by surprise. Most of this info is from the links you provided.. rog Friday #9
k&r n/t area51 Thursday #6
Is Copy Fail a remote exploit or a local exploit? LPBBEAR Friday #10

rog

(963 posts)
4. It looks like developers are already on this ...
Thu Apr 30, 2026, 11:37 PM
Thursday
From this link, cited in the OP.

Edited to add that (apparently) it hasn't been found in the wild (yet).

Users at particularly high risk of Copy Fail exploitation include "multi-tenant Linux hosts, CI runners & build farms, kubernetes/container clusters, and Cloud SaaS running user code." Common Linux servers are only considered Medium risk, and single-user laptops and workstations are considered Lower risk. Due to the nature of the exploit, though, no Linux user is totally safe, since direct or remote access by a malicious user is all that's needed to execute the miniscule script and gain Root access for further exploitation.

It's fortunate that Xint Code disclosed this exploit and its fix to the development community first. Mainline Linux kernel commit a664bf3d603d already fixes the issue, and devs behind major distributions have either already shipped the fix to their distributions or are in the process of doing so.

Sector 001

(369 posts)
5. This exploit is nine years old.
Thu Apr 30, 2026, 11:50 PM
Thursday

They suspect that hackers have been using this exploit for years.

rog

(963 posts)
7. Actually the word is that it has not (yet) been seen in the wild.
Fri May 1, 2026, 02:57 AM
Friday

Why was it undiscovered for so long?

"Copy-Fail" was created by the intersection of three independent, seemingly benign changes to the Linux kernel made between 2011 and 2017. The dangerous combination arose because the 2017 change allowed pages from the system's page cache (which are normally read-only) to be placed into a writable buffer for a crypto operation. When the authencesn module performed its normal 4-byte scratch write, it was now writing directly into the page cache of a file, corrupting it . Because each of these changes was harmless on its own, their combined effect went unnoticed for nearly a decade.

The vulnerability wasn't found by a human manually auditing code - that's why it was undiscovered for so long. It was discovered by a cybersecurity researcher named Taeyang Lee using an AI-powered code auditing tool called Xint Code

"Copy Fail" is a severe and reliable flaw born from the complex interaction of features, highlighting new challenges in code security. This is less about negligence and more about the limitations of traditional auditing to spot such "polyglot" bugs, which are now being exposed by advanced AI tooling.

As of today (May 1, 2026), no active exploitation has been confirmed in production environments. This is consistently reported across multiple authoritative sources:

CERT-EU (the official Computer Emergency Response Team for EU institutions) published an advisory on April 29 confirming public PoC release but did not report active exploitation .

奇安信 (Qi'anxin Threat Intelligence), a major Chinese cybersecurity firm, explicitly states: "在野利用状态 — 未发现" ("In-the-wild exploitation status — not discovered" ) .

Flashbots, a real-world production environment that uses Linux systems, investigated their exposure and confirmed: "No exploitation observed" on their deployed images.

However, as of April 30, major distributors still hadn't shipped final patches . This window is when in-the-wild exploitation is most likely to emerge.

This is a very serious flaw, but its impact is concentrated on shared hosting and cloud environments. Home users are lower priority for attackers, and a standard system update will fully protect you.

Edited to add that: Security teams are treating this as a race to patch before attackers begin using it.

I'm running Linux Mint - I imagine it will be patched in the next kernel update.

rog

(963 posts)
9. Wow - that caught me by surprise. Most of this info is from the links you provided..
Fri May 1, 2026, 12:01 PM
Friday

I'm not sure why you're expressing so much anger about this, but I encourage anyone who's interested to follow your text links and then do a search for further info if they want.

Thanks for posting this information - sorry you're having a bad day.

Just curious ... did you read my posts, or is this just a knee-jerk reaction? Honestly, I'm puzzled.

LPBBEAR

(676 posts)
10. Is Copy Fail a remote exploit or a local exploit?
Fri May 1, 2026, 06:57 PM
Friday

Copy-Fail (CVE-2026-31431) is a local exploit. Specifically, it is a Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) vulnerability, meaning an attacker must already have a, typically unprivileged, foothold on the Linux system—such as a user account, a container, or a shell—to exploit it.

For most Linux users this is a non starter. If no one uses your personal system but you or if you don't routinely allow skilled hacker level people access to your personal computer than you have nothing to worry about. Some Internet facing systems are likely to have multiuser accounts on one system and yes the sys-admins who take care of those systems should be keeping a wary eye on users as well as watching for updates that address this issue.

The guy that started this thread has a habit of trying to denigrate Linux. He has numerous posts trying to do that.

There will be a fix for this out soon if not already. Just do your updates and you'll be fine

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Open Source and Free Software»Copy Fail: This Exploit G...