Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(103,419 posts)
Mon Apr 10, 2023, 08:18 AM Apr 2023

News & Commentary April 6, 2023



https://onlabor.org/april-6-2023/

By Maddie Chang

Maddie Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.

In today’s news and commentary, Oregon considers a bill to address wage theft in construction, the EEOC brings a discrimination claim against a restaurant on behalf of a transgender employee, and a new Department of Labor survey finds widespread labor violations in the Southern California garment industry.

The Oregon state legislature is considering a bill to address wage theft in the construction industry. House Bill 2057 would make general contractors responsible for their subcontractors’ wage theft, and would allow workers to sue for their wages for up to six years after the work took place. The idea behind the bill is that because general contractors are more established and stable than subcontractors, workers are more likely to recover unpaid wages. General contractors are also in a better position to prevent wage theft in the first instance in their selection of subcontractors. The Oregon Law Center, which testified at the bill hearing further explained: “The tiers of employment make it difficult for workers to reclaim unpaid wages because each tier is free from any liability to the next.” The bill’s third reading is scheduled for today.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is bringing its first claim on behalf of a trans worker since 2017. The suit alleges that T.C. Wheelers Bar & Pizzeria in Tonawanda, New York subjected Quinn J. Gambino, a trans employee, to harassment by misgendering him, asking invasive questions about his body, and making anti-trans comments. The claim is that this harassment amounted to constructively discharging Gambino. In pursuing this case, the EEOC is building on the Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, which held that discrimination against trans workers violates Title VII. The agency first sought a pre-litigation settlement through the conciliation process. It now brings this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, Buffalo Division.

FULL story at link.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»News & Commentary April 6...