Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(103,419 posts)
Thu May 4, 2023, 10:07 AM May 2023

News & Commentary April 28, 2023


https://onlabor.org/april-28-2023/

By Greg Volynsky

Greg Volynsky is a student at Harvard Law School.


In today’s News & Commentary, the Sixth Circuit hears oral arguments in a case challenging the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. labor board prosecutors accuse Starbucks of refusing to bargain in good faith with 144 unionized cafés, YouTube Music contract workers unionize, and Lyft lays off more than a quarter of its workforce.

On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard oral arguments to determine whether the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) of 1970 granted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) too much authority. The case could undermine the legality of hundreds of OSHA workplace safety requirements, affecting regulations that have been in place for 50 years. Allstates Refractory Contractors LLC challenged the OSHA safety rules, arguing that the OSH Act’s requirement that rules be “reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment” is too vague. OSHA contends that more than five decades of court decisions back the agency’s rulemaking authority, emphasizing that before implementing any permanent health or safety standards, the agency is required to identify significant risks that can be mitigated through changes in practices and determine that new standards are both economically and technologically viable. The case comes one year after the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically escalated its war against the administrative state.

On Wednesday, U.S. labor board prosecutors accused Starbucks of refusing to bargain in good faith with 144 unionized cafes, including the first two cafes to unionize with Starbucks Workers United. The coffee chain is accused of insisting on unacceptable proposals and undermining the union’s representatives. In response, Starbucks claims the union has delayed progress towards first contracts. Starbucks Workers United has won elections at 300 of the company’s 9,000 corporate-run US cafes, but none have secured a collective bargaining agreement with the company.

FULL story at link above.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»News & Commentary April 2...