Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:55 AM Jul 2012

Classic Beauties Get a Shocking Phototshop Treatment

“What would have happened if the aesthetic standard of our society had belonged to the collective unconscious of the great artists of the past?” So asks Italian artist Anna Utopia Giordano in her Venus project, which re-imagines classic artistic depictions of Venus with a modern and extreme Photoshop makeover. What begin as mostly Rubenesque beauties are transformed into busty, slim-waisted figures more closely matching the ideals we are bombarded with today.




Read More
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Classic Beauties Get a Shocking Phototshop Treatment (Original Post) Neoma Jul 2012 OP
"Six is the new 14" leveymg Jul 2012 #1
sad. patrice Jul 2012 #2
The modified images are strangely hideous. qb Jul 2012 #3
juxtaposition with unaltered bodies accentuates the hideousness zazen Jul 2012 #4
He also should have TlalocW Jul 2012 #5
Most telling line from the link: intheflow Jul 2012 #6
That's just our modern conditioning making that value judgement. harmonicon Aug 2012 #8
They were still being influenced by the Greek view of beauty 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #24
Well... not all is "fixed" parkia00 Jul 2012 #7
the original women are WAY more attractive, imo NoMoreWarNow Aug 2012 #9
Ugh Stargazer09 Aug 2012 #10
I spent my youth worrying about being too skinny. Neoma Aug 2012 #11
I got teased about that, too. Stargazer09 Aug 2012 #12
Well, it's like how angry shouting people try to scare other people to protect themselves. Neoma Aug 2012 #14
They ask "Which do you find more attractive?" DaveJ Aug 2012 #13
The masterpieces are far better than the photo-shopped copies. Beacool Aug 2012 #15
Not that they don't judge mens looks either. Neoma Aug 2012 #16
I prefer the more zoftig origionals. marble falls Aug 2012 #17
I saw this... GTurck Aug 2012 #18
I'll confess, though, that I find Durer's Eve a bit too chunky around the hips starroute Aug 2012 #19
Women aren't supposed to have man-hips. Neoma Aug 2012 #20
Scary! McCamy Taylor Aug 2012 #21
I don't see that slimming the Venus improved the work... I wonder how this experiment will be midnight Aug 2012 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Pharaoh Aug 2012 #23

qb

(5,924 posts)
3. The modified images are strangely hideous.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:21 AM
Jul 2012

The artist makes a valuable statement about obsession over body image.

zazen

(2,978 posts)
4. juxtaposition with unaltered bodies accentuates the hideousness
Reply to qb (Reply #3)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:33 AM
Jul 2012

The women look emaciated next to the plump cherubs and angels.

TlalocW

(15,624 posts)
5. He also should have
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:43 AM
Jul 2012

Had some of the cupids lose their love handles and had them sporting six-packs.

TlalocW

intheflow

(28,915 posts)
6. Most telling line from the link:
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:51 AM
Jul 2012
While some may appear to have found some healthy improvement with their digital nip and tuck, others turn out looking disturbingly thin and adolescent.


Disturbingly adolescent is right! Although very familiar with most of these paintings, I never before noticed that all the women are without pubic hair. After this photoshop treatment, it popped right out at me. They don't look like shaved women, they look like a bunch of 'tweens who have been turned into sex objects. Ewwww.

harmonicon

(12,008 posts)
8. That's just our modern conditioning making that value judgement.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 12:01 PM
Aug 2012

Into the 20th century, even nude photographs were altered to remove pubic hair, because showing it was considered to be unsavory, and pornographic, or at least more pornographic.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
24. They were still being influenced by the Greek view of beauty
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 01:13 PM
Aug 2012

In which body hair wasn't seen as particularly beautiful.

If you notice most of their statues (male and female) were hairless. Even David only has a tiny tuft of pubic hair. None on his chest or anywhere else.

This stems from their view of pre-pubescent boys as the ideal of what is beautiful.

I was really disturbed when I first heard that (some documentary, don't remember the name). Puts all those old statues in a new light when you consider the artist was comparing all the models to a naked underage boy.

Different times, different standard and all. But yeesh.

 

NoMoreWarNow

(1,259 posts)
9. the original women are WAY more attractive, imo
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 12:40 PM
Aug 2012

I don't know why people don't find the classic natural female figure beautiful.

Stargazer09

(2,159 posts)
10. Ugh
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:20 PM
Aug 2012

I liked the originals much better.

My oldest daughter (who just turned 13) is already worried about getting fat. She's a size 4 and is 5'11" tall! I am constantly telling her to stop worrying. I hate our society for making her feel bad about her body at such a young age.

Stargazer09

(2,159 posts)
12. I got teased about that, too.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:32 PM
Aug 2012

I was super thin for years, and it was difficult, but I think I had an easier time than the girls in my class who were heavier.

Why can't everyone just be accepted for who they are?

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
14. Well, it's like how angry shouting people try to scare other people to protect themselves.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:44 PM
Aug 2012

People try to hide their own insecurities by pointing out 'bad' things about other people. I don't know any time worse in a persons life than puberty as far as insecurities go.

DaveJ

(5,023 posts)
13. They ask "Which do you find more attractive?"
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:41 PM
Aug 2012

Hmm. I wouldn't really know having no idea what their personalities are. I mean, how has shallowness become such an acceptable trait?

I can say that the thinner women look hungrier. Hungry usually equals cranky so I'd guess I'd be more attracted to the former women. Just a guess.

Beacool

(30,322 posts)
15. The masterpieces are far better than the photo-shopped copies.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 04:27 PM
Aug 2012

Standards of beauty have changed, but the obsession with a woman's appearance has only gotten worse.

Why is it that women as powerful as Hillary or Michelle are still judged by their appearance? During Obama's last State of the Union two of the most tweeted topics were Michelle's dress and Hillary's headband.

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
16. Not that they don't judge mens looks either.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 04:49 PM
Aug 2012

Obama not having enough gray hair during his campaign.

GTurck

(826 posts)
18. I saw this...
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 06:11 AM
Aug 2012

project last winter on the Net. What it shows is a change from sensuousness to sexiness. We seem to confuse the two.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
19. I'll confess, though, that I find Durer's Eve a bit too chunky around the hips
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:52 PM
Aug 2012

Especially compared with his very buff Adam.



midnight

(26,624 posts)
22. I don't see that slimming the Venus improved the work... I wonder how this experiment will be
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 06:14 PM
Aug 2012

perceived by others?

Response to Neoma (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Classic Beauties Get a Sh...